It has been awhile since we've discussed fundamentals, but it is definitely something subscribers of our newsletter can expected quite frequently. In today's chart of the day, we can safety assume that corporate profits tend track the overall growth of the economy. While not always true, generally this tends to be the case majority of the time (link here). After a four year expansion, in recent months my view has been that profitably has most likely reached its peak. There are a few observations we could make by looking at chart below:
- Corporate profits as a % of GDP are extremely high and rolling over
- Historically, profit margins are very cyclical and volatile in nature
- During secular bear markets, mean reversion impacts equity prices
- Best time to invest into equities is when profits are at depressed levels
Irrespective of weather one sees valuations as attractive or fundamentals as improving (personally I think neither is true), one should always be cautious when profitably reaches extreme levels like we can see today. The fact of the matter is that corporate profits as a percentage of GDP have rarely reached dizzying heights like at present and the most likely scenario is mean reversion in coming quarters. Therefore, I think it is prudent that investors ask themselves weather or not they want to be positioned on the long side right here.
Chart 1: Corporate profit margins could soon mean revert
Source: Short Side of Long
Historically, the best time to invest into equities has been during disappointment in corporate profits. Certain readers are most likely asking why would corporate profit margins mean revert? Why couldn't they stay elevated?
Well basically, the recent expansion has been built mostly on labour cost cutting and that is why margins have managed to approach record highs despite anaemic growth in the last few years. With Federal Reserve and US government closely linked towards a goal of further employment, one has to consider the following:
As US debt problems come to the forefront of global attention (just like Europe), further public support will soon start to fade and austerity will take its place. With wage growth at very low levels, households will not be able to maintain spending for a prolonged period of time (ECRI already thinks we are in a recession).
On the other hand, if CEOs suddenly (read: magically) turn optimistic, they might consider boasting their payrolls. But ask yourself, at what cost? Obviously, the answer would be at the cost of decreasing their margins.
And if CEOs opt for further cost cutting instead? With subpar growth (last GDP quarter was flat if you believe BLS and most likely contracted if you do not), this could definitely increase risks and dip us into a recession.
Therefore, you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. In my opinion, we are about to witiness a mean reversion in corporate profitability regardless of outcome, as we have most likely has reached its limits for the cycle. Now comes the painful part, which is usually jam-packed with earning disappointments and investor losses (especially during equity secular bear markets).
What I Am Watching

Very brief and simple post that gets straight to the point.. Those are truly the best.
ReplyDeletewonderful explanation. Corporate profits are 70% higher than their average. We would have at least seen a crash 40% on the S&P500 or at least to 950 (I guess it would be good to start long when it reaches 825 and do some further buying as it drops). The cycle down to the deepest alley might be completed in 2015-2016.
ReplyDeleteHey T - how much of these corp profits are from the banks/any financial instit w/ derivs and what impact has the suspension of mk to mkt had on this number?
ReplyDelete"As US debt problems come to the forefront of global attention (just like Europe), further public support will soon start to fade and austerity will take its place."
ReplyDeleteThis line of reasoning has brought Europe to its knees. It's not a public debt problem. It's not a demand problem caused in large part by private (corporate and household) paying off debt. Austerity in times of weak economies reduces demand and exacerbates economic weakness.
Oops. I meant to say "It's not a demand problem caused in large part by private (corporate and household) paying off debt."
DeleteBTW I really appreciate this entry re corporate profits looking shaky. Don't want to sound like a troll when I'm a big fan of the Short Side of Long.
Yes, debt is a problem, however I like this video of marc faber above.
ReplyDeletealso technically the market is in trouble, when you look at the charts.
On friday opex, the nasdaq daily volume - nasdaq daily chart and daily volume gave warning here
normally this happens when the smart money wants to get out, before big news hits the market. Hmmmmmm, I wonder what that could be LOL.
Anonymous March 16 @ 3:12 AM - yes I agree. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous March 16 @ 5:32 AM - corporate profits remain extremely high and as already explained in the post, corporate profit margins are notoriously cyclical. Therefore I do agree that if profits come under pressure, S&P will eventually trade lower. However, at this point in time I do not think we are in for a major crash like during 2008 (anything could happen). If S&P 500 was to trade towards 1,100 (major support from 2010 and 2011 corrections) I would be quite bullish actually.
Anonymous March 16 @ 9:05 AM - According to the charts I've seen, financial share of the overall profit is decent, but not overwhelming. I do have charts of non-finanacial corporate profit margins too, but I did not post it. They are quite similar. Regarding mark to market, I am not extremely smart to answer that properly, so I am not going to pretend.
Douglas - Even though Europe has been brought to its knees, one can easily notice that government spending has not been reduced all that much. As a matter of fact debt levels are rising just about everywhere in Europe. If they are on their knees now, I wonder where they will be when things get even worse in coming years. Printing money by buying PIIGS bonds and bailing out banks via LTRO is not a solution, only a postponing of the actually D-Day!
Chip - I wrote about Nasdaq a week or two ago on the blog. I also think that it looks like its topping right now. As a matter of fact Nasdaq 100 has barley exceeded its March 2012 high, which was set a year ago.
Your post assumes a lot! Yawn
ReplyDeleteDr. Copper just broke support. The Copper market is in technical trouble. The market has been coiling within a symmetrical triangle pattern since October 2011. Things don't seem to be confirming the rise in S&P.
ReplyDeleteMitch
thanks for share..
ReplyDelete