Sunday, December 2, 2012

QE4 Rumours Start Circulating

Market Notes
Source: Short Side Of Long
  • Lets face it, sentiment surveys have not given investors an edge towards either the bullish or bearish side in recent months. When we look at the chart above, we can see that the AAII spread started to approach what one might call an extreme low reading or a contrarian buy signal. However, this was not confirmed by other surveys, especially the NAAIM, which was at the opposite spectrum of sentiment showing high optimism and therefore giving us contrarians a sell signal. Finally, Investor Intelligence remains around neutral readings, but here too advisors just move from bullish to neutral camps and back again. Not many are actually turning bearish. Furthermore, the market action has been one of sharp sell offs and just as sharp rallies, leaving behind weak bottoming phases without proper wash outs (also known as V reversals which are prone to failure). This can be seen in the June 2012 & November 2012 bottoms and is very much unlike the price action during the middle of 2010 & middle of 2011. Furthermore, at both the 2010 and 2011 sell offs, volatility spiked into what I call a "capitulation zone", whereas during recent sell offs the VIX has barley moved above 20 (historical average). The reason I was able to call a bottom in late September 2011 and early October of 2011, is because the majority entered total panic and expected a repeat of 2008. Back then, one prominent blogger wrote that "the cleansing process stocks should either test the March 09 lows, or if Bernanke tries to stop the bear market with another round of quantitative easing, we could see the March 09 lows breached." Today, the view of this same investor is to see all time new highs in the stock market and there are many like him. The market is up a lot since those days and the recent short term bottoms in June & November do not look like they were proper buying opportunities for longer term investors. The bull market that started in March 2009 is ageing and struggling to create any meaningful net gains. According to the historic data of the Presidential Cycle, the current rally is already one of the greatest ever. All of these are usually not good signs for the long run.
Source: Short Side Of Long
  • While sentiment surveys are not giving us the edge when it comes to stock market sentiment, we have to remember that these surveys are more about who "said" what, instead of who "did" what.  In the previous post, I discussed how within the foreign exchange world, the Australian Dollar Japanese Yen cross pair is commonly known as the perfect example of the carry trade concept and also a great sentiment indicator for all risk assets. A follow up on the recent COT positioning data shows that hedge funds have engaged into very large bullish bets on the Aussie Dollar and at the same time very bearish bets on the Japanese Yen. Looking at the chart above, readings have now moved into an extreme territory of 2.5 standard deviations away from the mean. This is a contrarian sell signal and a major warning flag for those long any risk asset, including global equities. The correlation coefficient between the Aussie Yen cross and MSCI World Equity Index stands at 80% positive over the last 260 days (one trading year) and 85% positive over the last 520 days (two trading years). In other words, these two assets move in essentially the same direction.
Source: BarChart / Short Side Of Long
  • I believe technical analysis is a useful tool when cross referencing fundamental conditions of an asset class. Price action on the chart can tell us what is currently happening, however in my opinion using technical analysis on its own to "predict" what will happen in the future is a recipe for disaster (many will disagree with me). The chart above shows Silver, the largest single holding investment in my fund. The goal of an investor like me is to buy low during panics, while the goal of a trader is to buy high with a break out in mind. Those who have been following the blog for a while would know of the major purchases in late December 2011, early July 2012 and again a technical breakout out of a small triangle in August 2012. There have been other minor positions through the last 12 months, but their NAV % is very small in comparison. The point is that I am not a buyer right now, while the majority of traders are ready to play the breakout on the upside with many positioning themselves to the long side as Silver's Open Interest explodes. Silver now approaches a major decision point, with fundamental conditions possibly improving further. The Federal Reserve could embark on another round of quantitative easing called QE4, where they buy Treasuries. If implemented as Operation Twist ends, this action could finally start pushing up the Fed's balance sheet and should be beneficial to precious metals. At the same time, Silver's price action has been stuck between a $26 support and $35 resistance without a clear break in either direction, indicating neither bulls nor bears dominate the trend. I am not into short term predictions, but one thing is certain - both the Gold and Silver price action has been rather weak in the last few days despite rumours of QE4 in circulation. Failure by these assets to break out on the upside and clear major resistance levels ($35 for Silver) despite favourable QE conditions, will signal that not all is well within the Precious Metals sector. Furthermore, Gold Miners have already broken down and have yet to confirm their recovery above 200 MA. With Gold up for the 12th annual year in the row, PMs bulls should carefully watch the price action in coming weeks as we await the Fed decision and the follow through price reaction (don't turn bearish in a secular bull market, just be cautious)!
 Source: Short Side Of Long
  • Investors continue to ignore Soft commodities like Sugar, Cotton, Coffee and Orange Juice - all which have been awful performers over the last 12 months. If an investors job is to buy fundamentally strong value at cheap prices, then it does not get any better than these assets right now. Sugar, in particular is my favourite agricultural commodity due to the demand and supply problems I see developing in the coming quarters and years. On the other hand, hedge funds do not seem to hold the same amount of optimism as I do, as they hold the lowest net long position in 5 years. Furthermore, small speculators which are also known as dumb money, continue to hold net short positions in Sugar. The price of this commodity is down 17% this year, down 47% since the February 2011 top and furthermore down over 66% from its all time highs. Finally, the Sugar price action shows that we have spent a very large amount of time trading below the 200 MA, usually a signal that a major bull market is just around the corner. I am looking forward to engaging further into the Sugar market in the coming weeks and months ahead, as I believe it offers great long term prospects.
    Featured Article
     Source: The Wall Street Journal

    Unless you have been living under a rock, you have probably noticed that the Fed is once again starting to "telegraph" its plans of action through various media outlets. The recent front page article in the Wall Street Journal, made the case that "bond buying is expected to continue in effort to spur slow-growing economy". In other words, it seems that only a few months after QE3 started, which essentially is QE infinity, the FOMC board is gearing up for QE4 or what some term as QE infinity expanding as Operation Twist ends in late December. 

    As Sober Look Blog and Ed Yardeni pointed out in recent days, Fed's balance sheet has not been growing all that much since the announcement of QE3. Let us remember that the Federal Reserve launched QE3 on September 13th of this year, when the overall Fed balance sheet stood at $2.825 trillion. Fast forward to today and the balance sheet sits at $2.853 trillion, which in a grand scheme of things is a very small increase at best.
     Source: Sober Look Blog

    It is my take that the Federal Reserve is noticing that $40 billion per month is just not enough to push stock prices higher and therefore achieve their desired "wealth effect". With that in mind, they are now gearing up to double down as they engage into purchases of Treasuries as well. At the rate of $40 billion in MBS and $45 billion in Treasuries, both being un-sterilised, the Fed will be mimicking QE2 at the rate of $680 billion over the 8 month period. Remember that QE2 was $600 over the 8 month period from November 2010 until June 2011.

    But... lets be honest here - the first part of this article has probably not told you anything new that you do not already know. It is just a summary of market expectations. The question investors need to ask themselves is whether or not more QE will work?

    This question is a very difficult one to answer, because there are no true facts as of today. These types of central banks programs are in experimental stages and investors do not have historical evidence from previous business cycles to draw upon. If you belong in the school of thought that sees money printing as an inflationary force, your view is that it will improve the value of assets that respond well to inflation (like stocks, commodities, corporate bonds & risk currencies etc). The other school of thought would obviously claim that money printing does not work and will not work into the future.
    Source: Short Side Of Long

    During the initiation phases of previous Fed programs like QE1, QE2 or Operation Twist, the stock market became extremely oversold, which helped the Fed and gave its programs some credibility. Consider that during the same time the Fed started to "telegraph" its plans of action, the percentage of stocks above the 50 MA entered single digit readings, while the volatility index (VIX fear gauge) spiked into the anxiety zone, and finally market expectations for inflation turned meaningfully down. At those inflection points, the market was ripe for a rebound regardless due to oversold conditions, so Fed's quantitate easing programs "gained the respect" of market participants. These so called Pavlov's dogs, or as I called them Bernanke's dogs, started to believe that the Federal Reserve could actually make the stock market rise.

    No one knows for sure how much of a rebound the stock market would have achieved without Fed's assistance, however one thing is certain - when the Fed engaged into a program promising QE to infinity aka QE3, it actually failed to push the stock market higher. Take a note that the Fed's announcement was on September 13th during a time when the stock market was overbought as the percentage of stocks above the 50 MA was close to 90%, while the volatility index was at extremely complacent levels last seen in 2007, and finally market expectations for inflation were truly overheating. As the inflation trade was already fully discounted by the market up to that point, Fed's QE3 announcement failed. Therefore in my opinion, this shows that the Fed does not have that much of a mystical ability to manipulate asset prices as easily as Bernanke's dogs would like to believe, unless of course the market conditions are ripe for a rebound regardless. So let us come back to the main question...
    Will more QE work?
    If we use equities as a measure of whether or not more QE will work, my personal opinion is that at the current market conditions, more QE will most likely NOT work properly like QE1 and 2 did. My view is that the stock market is just not oversold enough, there is no panic and anxiety when we gauge various indicators of sentiment including the VIX, and most importantly market participants expect inflation and growth as the main consensus outlook right now.
    Source: Albert Edwards / SocGen

    What waits for us around the corner are economic surprises to the downside (chart above), earnings disappointments, profit margin mean reversion and most likely another deflationary shock of some kind. If and when the Fed engages into QE5 after those events occur, as volatility rises dramatically and sentiment turns bearish once again, the Fed's mystical powers and abilities might all of a sudden re-awaken and once again appear to be working. Bernanke's dogs will praise the new programs of money printing and will hold hands singing "Kumbaya, my Lord, Kumbaya". But the more contrarian ones amongst us will know that the most likely outcome was one of oversold conditions, where a rally was overdue regardless and that Bernanke will just be throwing more fuel onto the fire which should give the eventual rally more of a boost.

    Trading Diary (Last update 16th of November 12)
    • Equities: Short positions are held in various US equity sectors, which include Dow Transports (IYT), Technology (XLK), Discretionary (XLY) and Industrials (XLI). Large put options have been bought on Apple (AAPL). Call options have been sold on Homebuilders (XHB), JP Morgan (JPM), Amazon (AMZN), IBM (IMB), Commonwealth Bank (CBA), Adidas (ADS) and others.
    • Bonds: There isn't a lot of exposure in the bond space, as we believe this sector is experiencing euphoric investor demand. Call options have been sold on Junk Bonds (HYG). We plan to short Long Bond Treasuries (TLT) in due time.
    • Currencies: Long positions are held in Japanese Yen (FXY). Put options have been bought on British Pound (FXB) & Canadian Dollar (FXC). Put options have been sold on Japanese Yen (FXY).
    • Commodities: Long positions are held in various commodity sectors, which include Silver (SLV, SIVR, PSLV, Comex futures), Agriculture (RJA, JJA) and Sugar (SGG). We plan to increase  longs in PMs and Softs in due time.
    What I Am Watching

    64 comments:

    1. Tiho,
      QE3 was announced in September, but there is 60 day settlement delay in MBS. Money hasn't really hit the market until mid November. It coincided pretty well with market bottom so you should wait with your QE3 failure call.
      Next big settlement is due on December 12th.
      You have been warned :)

      http://seekingalpha.com/article/1037431-the-settlement-delay-of-mbs-purchases-under-qe3-and-the-price-of-risk-assets

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. We're beginning to see more people starting to talk about this. I think few realized it early on. Thanks for posting the Seeking Alpha article.

        Delete
      2. However, what I have not seen talked about is that the Treasury auctioned $25 billion in Cash Management bills on the same day that the MBS settlements were to take place - November 14th. That auction absorbed much of the QE-Infinity liquidity (the MBS settlements were $26 billion). Very interesting to say the least.

        http://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/annceresult/press/preanre/2012/A_20121113_2.pdf

        Delete
    2. Another great post and also good video this week. Are you still short consumer stocks?

      ReplyDelete
    3. ikti - Yes, I completely understand how there is a delay. Many websites, blogs and news articles have covered this topic in-depth, so I think just about everyone knows. And when everyone knows something, it won't surprise the market, nor will it be a price mover.

      Thank you for your warning and all, but I do not really pay attention to settlement dates. You know Bernanke announced QE2 in late August 2010 during Jackson's Hole. There was no money printing until November FOMC meeting and the market rallied for more than 2 months from 1040 to 1220 (17.5%) without one settlement or one extra dollar being printed.

      Do you know why?

      Because the market is a discount mechanism and it prices in various events ahead of time. That is a good example of how market anticipated money printing from oversold conditions by rallying 17.5% without one dollar being printed. I ask myself... why didn't the stock market rally a lot out of QE3 Jackson's Hole announcement, despite a delay in settlement into November, same timeframe as with QE2? The market could have just as easily repeated the same rally as it did during QE2, but the problem is that easing today is most likely DISCOUNTED already as every man and his dog are quote articles about "more CB easing" and "reflation". It doest seem to be a surprise like it was in Jackson's Hole during 2010, when almost no one expected it.

      Therefore, for you to warn me about something that has happened already in November or will happen on December 12th is absolutely pointless to long term investor like myself. If you know it, and I know it, and Seeking Alpha wrote about it, every retail investor knows it. I hardly think it will surprise anyone too much. Personally, I try to look 6 to 12 months ahead, because I believe markets tend to look far into the future when they price in fundamentals. And I also try to figure out what could surprise the market... like QE3 or QE4 NOT working. Now that would be a major shock to just about everyone.

      Nevertheless, that is my view and how I have invested for a long time - each to their own I guess. :-)

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. "why didn't the stock market rally a lot out of QE3 Jackson's Hole announcement, despite a delay in settlement into November, same timeframe as with QE2"
        I think you answered your question already. Market was oversold, when QE2 was announced. You don't need much to bounce from oversold conditions. It would probably happen even without QE announcement.
        On the contrary, market was at multi year highs during QE3 announcement.
        It is plausible explanation of why market didn't rally on QE3 news.

        To be clear: I am bullish because my algorithm told me so, not because QE3 settlement delay.
        Maybe you are right, that everyone knows about this delay, but I could say the same: If I know and you know and readers of your blog knows about bad economic data and heavy long positioning on AUDJPY therefore everybody knows it and it is priced in :)

        We will know who was right soon enough.

        Delete
      2. Lucky for me - not many read my blog. Seeking Alpha is much much more popular, so I definitely wouldn't get my investment advice from Seeking Alpha or Business Insider or ZeroHedge. Also regarding Aussie Yen positioning, once you put the money down and your extended on the long side with the majority of the herd, you should know yourself what eventually happens next...

        Delete
    4. Also I would just like to warn Precious Metals investors that there is a major group-think on Gold right now. It doesn't mean Gold has to fall immediately , as we remain in a secular bull market, but serious caution is advised.

      ReplyDelete
    5. And more important still than surveys is where people are actually putting their money as this ZeroHedge article from last week points out.

      As I mentioned in my last post, I don't think it will happen, but God forbid that the current oversized, out-of-balance bullish bet pays off! If it does, we're going to the moon!!!!

      ReplyDelete
    6. If you are an investor in precious metals you have to be reading Martin Armstrongs work. Take a look at the Gold Arrays and the long term outlook. We are in a for a rough road in the precious metals.

      The computer is predicting a bounce next week then high volatility the next week. Look at the daily array which was calling for high volatility on 11/30. This article was sent out two weeks ago. I bought his report this year and saw him speak in philadelphia. The US government locked him up for 7 years because of his computer timing model. He is out of jail and telling it how it is.

      http://armstrongeconomics.com/693-2/2012-2/gold-the-rally/

      Tiho, he isn't an economist he is trader!

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Nobody has the ability to consistently predict market prices,let alone in the very distant future and with any meaningful degree of accuracy.
        He is neither an economist nor a trader:he's a scammer and the sooner you abandon the delusion that he somehow "knows something" that you don't,the better off you'll be,both financially and psychologically.

        Delete
    7. Dear Tiho,
      Thank you very much for yet another excellent post.
      I’d like to share with you my opinion about whether QE could be beneficial to stock prices.
      I start by reformulating your question as follows:can QE be beneficial to REAL stock prices(i.e. can it increase nominal stock prices more than it inflates the money supply)?
      Then,I think the first question one has to answer is whether QE can be beneficial to the underlying economy.And the answer is a very sound NO:QE actually undermines the economy by encouraging malinvestments and “bubble activities”,which result in a waste of scarce resources(real capital).One needs to look no further than the works of Mises and Rothabard to understand this basic fact.
      It then follows that QE doesn’t have the ability to increase real stock prices:it might increase nominal prices,but such gains cannot(in the long term)compensate the devaluation of the medium of exchange.
      It might as well end up pushing even nominal stock prices lower,as all the malinvestments take a toll on the real economy and cause it to run out of real capital,thus forcing economic activity to contract substantially.
      That’s why my favourite trade at this very moment is being long gold and short the S&P.Best case:the former goes up and the latter goes down.Otherwise,the former ought to go higher faster or lower slower than the latter.
      Finally,I too am a bit concerned about the recent surge in optimism in the gold market,particularly amongst the rank of the so-called muppets,as exemplified by the popular blogger you mention and his hapless subscribers.I would as such expect quite a lot of trendless volatility:the perfect way to ensure that sentiment cools down whilst traders and short term speculators get chopped out of the market.I regard a collapse as a rather remote possibility,particularly given the quite strong negative correlation with equities that gold exhibits during cyclical stock bear phases.I would save that scenario for the final “panic” phase of the downtrend in stocks and even that is not guaranteed,given that sooner or later gold has to enter the final,maniacal stage of its bull.(BTW,one of the main drivers of gold’s bull is the presence of negative real interest rates.Consideration about the size of the Fed’s balance sheet or the rate of money printing are of course important,but secondary.)

      ReplyDelete
    8. I was at the San Francisco Hard Assets Conference last month. Needless to say that while people are bearish on stocks there is an undivided and total belief among the participants that PMs are yet to top because history says that one (1) more parabolic rise is ahead of us when they decouple and out-perform the stock market. Really?

      I had a chance to have a small chat with Pam Aden and a few investors and professional advisors after Pam Aden's bullish presentation on PMs. When I said that PMs can drop like a rock along with the stock market just like during 2008, they (except Pam Aden) all looked at me funny and with blank look on their face. They obviously have no memory of Gold's 30% drop or they just disbelieved.

      The point is... when everyone thinks alike, watch out below.

      It is enjoyable to read Jeff Gundlach and his "kaboom" idea.. sure worth waiting for 2 years to buy the mother of all best value.

      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-30/bond-investor-gundlach-buys-stocks-sees-kaboom-ahead.html

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Yes, it is amazing how many people are adamant that in any stock market crash that gold and silver will not plunge.

        Delete
      2. Thank you for your thoughts Edwin, it is a very interesting perspective. I have to admit that I agree with you. People always ask me why I am long PMs and short stocks, and you have answered it well in your own comments. In case QE3 & QE4 etc work to the point they push prices higher, I can tell you that PMs will go much much higher than the stocks. Therefore, while my shorts might be losers, my longs will make me a lot more money.

        However... one news a hedge when one looks at what is coming around the corner. In case PMs do drop, I have my stock market shorts to protect some of my downside, because after all no one knows anything will happen for sure. I do believe policy makers will print large amounts of money which might not help stocks, but historically has always helped rare and precious assets - even Mr Gundlach is buying gem stones and Gold Miners. The question is will we have deflation first, before policy makers go nuclear and print something like $400 billion per month, instead of only $40 billion right now?

        Regardless one needs to be hedged and have protection incase he is wrong into the the future, because the framework for me is not clear cut. I receiver Marc Faber's newsletter and he himself also advised his subscribers to do the same. He is long 25% equities, long 25% Gold, long 25% cash and long 25% real estate. Furthermore, in the recent newsletter he said he is holding a large cash position. Also, Warren Buffet's cash position is the largest since 2007 market top too.

        On the other hand, other guys are so sure in their outlooks and that might cost them. Guys like Elliot Wave think everything will crash because we are in GRAND SUPER-WAVE on the downside, time cycle guys believe in 8 year cycle of Gold bottoms with last one in 2008 and see NO DOWNSIDE right now until 2016 so they are fully invested long, solar traders believe in magic of the sun and NASA so they are ALL-IN long side, and technical analysts believe in some wiggly lines on the chart to be able to predict the future outcomes, but they flip and flop their mind every week depending on what the price does.

        Delete
      3. Ah...Tiho, You like my suggestion...then you may like this one also.. You know, the Transportation index divergence (a la barometer for the health of the business and economic environment) has been flashing red for a year now...so until it is magically mended, it would be foolish to commit much at all in the market.

        Looking at the chart for the extended rally since 2009, there is a pocket underneath that (logically)may be filled.

        For 2013, I will continue to trade just for fun and do more travels to kill time. Mr. Market, please give me one more leg down. Looking at the NDX chart, a 35% haircut to fill the air pocket would be nice.

        Delete
    9. Anonymous - I enjoyed reading your comments as you sound like a well read and well informed investor. Just like you, I have also chosen to be long PMs and short stock due to various reasons I will not go through here once more, but it is mainly linked to fundamentals.

      In late July and early August, I was banging the table and saying that "fundamentally PMs could benefit a lot more than stock prices, and it wouldn't surprise me if stocks top if and when starts QE3". I have been repeating that view up to this day. That is because, devaluing the currency has never worked in increasing consumer prosperity and "net wealth effected" General Bernanke is set out to do. If a central banker could do that, Robert Mugabe and a League of Zimbabwe's Extraordinary Central Bankers would have created a nation of multi billionaires.

      And with that in mind, I thought that corporate profits most likely would not actually benefit in QE3 or QE4 and stock prices would be eventually effected on the downside. This is true, especially if previous QEs falsely pushed stock prices above their long term mean. Those who have engaged into long Silver short Nasdaq trade in August with anticipation of QE3 helping rare assets more than stock prices as I did, would be up about 20% right now.

      On a side note - I think it is time to consider shorting the Aussie Dollar. I will be looking long and hard into opening up some positioning soon.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Thank you.I think that the greatest possible edge a speculator can have is a proper understanding of sound economic theory,as formulated by the Austrian school.I think that a well balanced portfolio of PMs,stock shorts,currencies(USD and JPY vs bubble currencies)and a bit of softs and cash ought to do well under almost any circumstances.I too am short the aussie against the usd and the ypy and I expect it to be an excellent trade,as I think the great unwinding of the credit/RE bubble is about to begin down there.I also submit to you that shorting Italian BTPs might prove to be a good bet,given their recent euphoric rally combined with the sorry state of their finances and a seriously deteriorating economy.Currently they’re being levitated by market participants’ faith in the powers that be…the potent directors fallacy.At 115 they’d be a steal,but even at their current level they offer decent value in my opinion,particularly as further hedge against PMs' exposure.

        Delete
      2. I am bullish on the yen and the fundamental reason is there for a rally. I just wonder if this election in japan is enough to bring the house down on the yen in 2013. There isn't enough risk reward. I will ignore the crowded japanese trades unit i can see something a little more clear.

        Delete
    10. I don't think the general thesis, that now QE is for lifting stockprices is correct. Since the Chinese have learned their lesson, the USA is lacking buyers of their debt atht hese ridiculous low interest rates. Direct monetization. It's easy as that. But only very few seem to recognize it, because of the weak labour-market phrases.

      Additionally i think, most people have not recognized, that OT2 was in fact monetization of debt, too - although it didn't appear on the balance sheet:
      The FED guarantees ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) until 2014.

      This means for all bond durations that fall into this time-window, that the FED is guaranteeing the value as if it would directly buy them!

      But this doesn't work for the durations of the longer bonds and therefore the FED must monetize them to keep the rates artificially low.

      Since now the FED has run out of short durations, the trick with the sterilization is coming to an end and it needs to monetize the US debt again.

      Forget all the talk about the weak labour market or the economy. It's about financing the US debt while distracting the world from this fact.

      ReplyDelete
    11. Tiho
      Great articles.
      There is a good correlation, as one would expect, betw PM or Gold prices with Feds' balance sheet direction. The steep increase in latter also saw sharp increase in Gold prices heading to the peak in Aug11. Will Feds BS expand from here? Replacing Twist is merely keeping status quo? Why hasn't Feds BS expand despite OT last year? Will recent QE infinity, expand BS.. and by what amount?
      Thanks

      ReplyDelete
    12. Tiho - that blogger still has a month for his prediction that "2012 will go down as one of the worst years in human history. Certainly in the same category as 1932 if not worse." to work out. What is comedic is how some of these bloggers waffle and change their forecasts so sharply. Now he has flipped from a stock disaster to new stock high but either way he will say he is correct. I said a few weeks ago he is now "contrarian indicator"

      That said, can I ask your thinking behind selling options on the strong sectors like homebuilders and junk bonds as opposed to weaker sectors?

      And I like the idea of Aussie short.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Actually someone IS a good trader when he is able to change his forecast 180% when condidions change.

        Delete
      2. And a good trader IS someone who can admit they were wrong and learns from mistakes. I'm still waiting for my burrito from that bet.

        Delete
      3. It is true that traders really do not know what they are doing, so they constantly flip flop 180 degrees. That is not a market skill, but I have to admit it is a very good skill for money management. On the other hand, those who understand fundamentals do not get things wrong as much, so they don't have to be constantly shifting money 180 degrees non stop. They instead wait for their theory to play out.

        Now, when I discuss fundamentals, majority of the narrow minded traders (usually who use technical analysis) claim that fundamentals are a lagging indicator and aren't useful when it comes to investing. That is true and therefore I understand what these traders are saying. But that is not how one use fundamentals to invest properly. What these traders fail to understand is the basic mechanism of how markets work. So let me explain quickly:

        Markets are a discount mechanism majority of the time, so the goal of an investor is not to follow CURRENT fundamentals which CNBC or Bloomberg report. Instead, the goal of an investor is to anticipate and envision what the fundamentals for a certain asset will look like 6 to 12 months from now. That is a difficult job, because using creative imagination and have an extensive knowledge of historical business cycles, is not everyones forte. Most people do not like putting in the hard yards studying endless decades of history, so they opt for the easier solution: charts.

        Most technical analysis and cycle traders do not understand this basic concept and even if they did... to be honest with you, their knowledge and skill in this area is so low, that they couldn't do it. They struggle to understand basic concepts of a business cycle / investment cycles, commodity cycles etc.

        Delete
      4. Maybe they don't make mistakes so often, but when they do and then stubbornly wait "for their theory to play out" they can loose big chunk of their money.

        Delete
      5. And who says that investors have to sit around and wait to lose a big chunks of money. Investors can also use some of the tactics traders have including stop losses to minimise stop losses. Why does it have to be so black and white?

        Delete
    13. Some interesting comments on the PMs.

      I am certainly not seeing a large buying sentiment on the PMs.
      This is low to medium on the sentiment measures i use.
      Gold peaked Sep 11, Nov 11, Mar 12 & lastly Oct 12. Silver May & Aug 11.
      The lowest point was in mid Jul 12 for the last 3 years.
      The Sprott premium on silver etf is very low another indicator saying sentiment is very low at present.

      I have been reading Jim Sinclair website for the last 8 years and he has said over the last 6 months, he has never seen so many of his readers chucking in the towel.

      So overall i dont think we are headed for a crash in the PMs, maybe some whipsawing, but the trend is still up.

      Phil R

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Hows that going for the silver bulls today?

        Delete
      2. Joel, saw your note on M Armstrong who has a very impressive economic model and i really enjoy reading his reports. However silver has moved from $6 to $33 while nearly going through $50 over the last 10 years. A small drop from $34.50 to $33 doesnt concern me, if it dropped below $25 i might be worried. I see these drops as an opportunity rather than to be feared.

        "It's a bull market, you know." said Mr Patridge

        Phil

        Delete
      3. Until we overtake and close above $40 dollars silver is building a base. I am a silver bull also, but both silver and gold will have a better buying opportunity in 2013. According to Martin's computer it is January 2013 and the best bet is to wait or short the GDX. i have been short GDX since may of 2011. I truly believe this vehicle is a scam like UNG, VXX, SKF, etc. It will fall below the 2009 lows.

        Delete
      4. VXX is a scam? Can you elaborate on this?

        Delete
    14. Martin Pring:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sEauOXKAg0&feature=g-all

      ReplyDelete
    15. I don't know if the following article is bullish or bearish but very interesting

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9717894/Tax-hitmen-to-track-your-spending.html

      ReplyDelete
    16. Tiho
      Regarding your durable goods chart, look at what happened to SPY when ROC of durable goods reaches the 2sigma deviation low.
      http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2012/11-2/20121202_DurGoods.png

      This is from this article
      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-12-02/cautious-optimist-skeptical-pessimist

      ReplyDelete
    17. Hello Tiho,

      three thoughts according to my observations:

      1. With bond yields close to nothing, where should money go if not into dividend stocks / corporate bonds?
      2. What could be catalyst for falling stock prices if weak PMI data could not do the trick?
      3. Is there a chance that emerging markets save the day regarding expansive monetary policy worldwide?

      That in mind I wonder how much downside potential there is for high quality stocks. If any.

      With best regards

      M.

      ReplyDelete
    18. Phil - thank you for the PMs update.

      Niels - Do you subscribe to that gentlemen's newsletter? Commodities definitely look oversold from May 2011 peak, while US stocks have managed a new higher high into 2012. On relative basis, I could envision Silver outperforming US stocks and that is my portfolio. Having said that, it remains to be seen if it happens or not.

      macrot - this care interesting charts. I have also covered manufacturing slowdown in the US on this blog variety of times. You know, the bulls use to say, well this cycle is very weak in recovery, but at least manufacturing is doing well. Now the bulls say, well at least employment is still ok, despite manufacturing weakness. Perma bulls are always the same... they do not understand that manufacturing is an early cycle outperformed while employment is an lagging economic indicator. Same people always repeat same mistakes, because of their failure to understand how business cycles work.

      M. - Hi there. To try and answer some of your questions:

      1. I'd say that bond yields remain in the later phase of a secular bull market, which started in 1981. Yields will go as low as they want to go until it ends, which could mean bond prices will top in three days, or three weeks or three months or even three quarters or three years. Who knows. Just because yields are low doesn't mean that money has to leave to go else where. In 1999 Nasdaq was extremely expensive and rising vertically, but the Dumb Money didn't hesitate and rushed into the index pushing it to double once again by March of 2000.

      2. PMI data did not yet get weak. We are just flirting with 50 readings, with is neutral. Real negative readings, that affect the market are found below 46 and into high 30s. If that happens, than you will see it affect stocks. Let me remind you that Industrial Production has just started to roll over like in 2007, so if it continues lower stocks will anticipate this weakness and sell off rapidly. So to answer your question, one data release does not create a fundamental trend within the economic cycle. It takes months to establish this, so exercising patience is a necessity.

      3. Not from my view. They have their own problems and furthermore, emerging market growth is now highly correlated to the developed market growth. That means they will move in sync, regardless of weather or not the next crisis is started by EU or China or US. If you believe in de-coupling by Emerging Markets, you should invest some more time researching the way growth has been synchronised throughout the globe, since WTO let China join in 2002. Here is a chart of what I mean.

      I hope those views clearly answer those questions, but that does not mean I am right. These are my views and I have acted upon them, but everyone should do their own research before they invest their own hard earning capital. Best of luck!

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. I don't subscribe on Martin Pring's newletter. I have meet Martin once and read several of his books. His site: http://www.pring.com/

        Delete
    19. p.s. Merry Xmas as presents come early for my fellow Australians who have received another rate cut by the RBA this morning. Since they are not meeting since the first week of February, it looks as if RBA has decided to gift the country an early Xmas present as the beach holiday season starts in a couple of weeks!

      ReplyDelete
    20. German Sentiment

      Sentix: 40% bullish reading
      AnimusX: 50 % bullish reading
      Cognitrend: 58% bullish 19% bearish
      Stock newsletter:30% bullish
      DZ Bank quarterly survey (some 1000 retail investors) : 16% bullish 35% bearish 39 % neutral
      VDAX: 14%

      Despite the strong DAX, German retail investors stay bearish. Short term traders(Sentix, AnimusX) seems a little bit too bullish. Not so easy to predict the market, only looking at sentiment indicators. I go back to neutral.

      Ben

      ReplyDelete
    21. Tiho
      I'm certain you have seen this but for other reader another contrarian indicator.
      http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-v05jl9dzdt8/UL7A3-aGxkI/AAAAAAAAQss/Y-DFXFH2J3w/s1600/20121204_etf.png

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Yes I have, but thanks for sharing with everyone who reads the blog. As I have been saying for awhile now, we are topping, if not already at a top. Complacent participants can be seen everywhere.

        Delete
      2. Yes, but December is the most bullish month for stocks during at least last three decades.

        Indeed the presidential cycle played out this year, irrespective of sentiment, fundamentals, etc.

        Best. Santiago

        Delete
      3. In my opinion, you should forget about the Presidential Cycle because the market has surprised to high on the upside, majority of the gains... if not all the gains are finished. The current Presidential Cycle has gone up 70% or more, while the historically the gain tend to be between 10% to 30% for a 4 year span. This has been one of the best bull market rallies ever! From my point of view, as a contrarian, you do not buy the best rally ever... you sell it.

        I understand that we came from very oversold place back in early 09, but nevertheless the market has rallied more than 110% since that low. Majority of the gains are done and if anything, we should mean revert lower towards a common Presidential Cycle return, despite what seasonal factors state.

        Delete
    22. The VIX is compressed below the 200 day MA, but at the same time refuses to make new lows. There is serious pressure building in the volatility index right now - chart here. I think we are moving closer and closer to a VIX break out where the initial leg of a bear market could start.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Hi Tiho,
        Thanks for the timely update. Chart link does not work btw. Please fix it when you have a chance.
        Thanks again!

        Delete
    23. Tiho,

      could you comment on your favorite leading economic indicators?.

      In this piece, Mish demonstrates some of the most popular are useless

      http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com.es/2007/01/leading-economic-indicators.html

      however as for the ones that pass the filter: the M Prime looks difficult to get, Yield Curve: there are some discussion whether keeps working given the huge level of intervention.

      Best. Santiago

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. I follow ECRI, Global PMIs, Conference Board LEIs and OECD LEIs, plus a lot of business confidence indicators around the world, especially for manufacturing powerhouses like Germany and Japan. Having said all that, it is not the most important thing.

        Since majority of leading indicators are actually are constructed around the market price itself, my favourite leading indicator is to follow the market. While not perfect, the market trie sot discount future conditions. So do not pay attention to what is currently happening, but as I always say, try and anticipate what will happen next 6 to 12 months into the future.

        That is how I think and thinking is very difficult when it comes to investing (or anything else). People rather just relay on some indicators to do the thinking for them, be it LEIs or technical signals. But the truth is, there is no easy way to make money, otherwise we would all be overnight millionaires!

        Delete
    24. I have been actively investing and trading in the equity markets for over 40 years. I was directed somehow (I don't even recall how) to this blog of Tiho's a few months ago. I am extremely impressed by what I am reading here. I give Tiho a lot of credit for giving away so much information and his hard work that he obviously puts in to create the analysis and so freely willing to share it with us. Keep up the good work. I write on a private site that a friend of mine organized and runs and that only a small group of us belong to. We like it that way. In any event, as a thank you to Tiho for his writings here, I am copying and posting here my most recent commentary about my thoughts. ARRJD


      Dec 4, 2012
      Market closed down again today at 1407. Another look at the technical indicators that I am using to try to determine the next market move or trend from this current pivot point, continue to lead me to believe that there is a greater potential for a substantial downturn here.
      I really think that the only thing that is preventing this downturn is that there are enough bulls out there who really believe that Washington will come to terms and fix the problem, combined with enough other bears who are too scared to be short in the event that the politicians do come up with something and we get that 1000 point rally in the DOW that Jeremy Seigel opined about on TV the other day.
      Frankly, I have no faith in our politicians. With the likes of an Obama, a Reed and a Pelosi, who are really three of the most dishonest and dumb politicians who have ever run our country still at the helm, I do not have any hope for there being a truly Good for America solution. They will do only what is good for them and their socialistic, power-hungry agenda.
      That being the case, I intend to stick with my present plan, until the market tells me differently, meaning that there becomes a decisive change in the trend that would cause me to believe that we are going to have a meaningful continuation of the long in the tooth bull market that began in March 2009.
      Frankly, I don't see the economic basis for a continuation of this bull market. With the market at 1407 it has been a good run from 666. But if taxes are going to go up, then I am of the opinion that the economy will go down. And if the economy goes down then it will take the stock market down with it.
      That may be what the various technical indicators that I am watching are starting to point to. They have limited, if any predictive value, but the ones I have developed for my own use, do seem to have a good track record once a new trend is in place. I don't believe that they can predict the new direction at a pivot point, but once the new trend is set in place, I believe that they give some added guidance.
      In light of that, I shall continue to remain hedged with a sizable short position on the overall market against individual core positions as we slog through this political mess that is creating a further economic mess. Once the political side show is over, then the market will focus solely on the economic future and with a 17 trillion dollar debt owed by the Federal Govt, things don't look very good right now for 2013.
      There are many conflicting opinions in the market by many technicians and fundamental analysts, and many of them like to point out only those "facts" which support their opinions rather than having their opinions conform to the most accurate of technical and fundamental measures and data. I choose to weigh all of the data before coming to an opinion. And when the data is conflicting, then it is not unexpected that I would expect to be conflicted in my own opinions as well. The next seven to ten market days may be very crucial in telling us what the next intermediate move in the market is going to be. Keep a sharp lookout here. Good investing/trading. ARRJD

      ReplyDelete
    25. AND HERE IS AN UPDATE THAT I WROTE EARLIER THIS MORNING:

      Two points to make here:

      1. The market is very conflicted right now because of the "debate" in Washington. If the Washington fakers decide they want to be home for Christmas they will reach a crappy and temporary deal of some sort and one which really does nothing for the long term good of our country. That will probably give the market a knee jerk bounce before year end. But the market structure right now does not appear to me to be sound and therefore the so-called January effect might get used up in some kind of bounce in Dec, but once the window dressing of the mutual funds is over and if I am correct and there is an absence of buyers starting Jan 2, then we could see a massive correction or the beginning of a new intermediate length bear market taking us through at least the first half of 2013. That is my current thesis.

      2. Market timing and value investing, I have come to conclude, are really two sides of the same coin. If you are a value investor you are buying stocks because you think they are lower than than they will be in the future. If you are a market timer you also a buyer of stocks when you think that they are lower now than they will be in the future. The only difference between an investor and a trader is their time frame. Investors usually like to buy after a panic like situation, when there is blood in the streets. Active traders tend to pursue the trend. So often they look for a breakout, even after a stock reaches a new high and then they enter the position in order to catch the follow through on that trend.

      Feel free to comment or criticize. I've been at this far too long to worry about what others have to think. Good investing/trading. ARRJD

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Enjoy the comments. Just short the miners!

        Delete
    26. I have also enjoyed the comments and the kinds words, so thank you a lot ARRJD. The only thing I would like to say is that from my personal opinion, the market is actually not focusing on the Washington "debate" nor the Fiscal Cliff. The media is focusing on that, so they brand ever rally and decline with a connection to who said what and where. But in reality, I'd say the market is actually focused on what profit margins and earnings will look like in 6 months or more from now.

      To be quite honest with you, we are seeing a dramatic fall in Business Capex everywhere, and without business investment it is hard to get growth, it is hard to get employment and it is hard to get stock markets moving higher. In my opinion, the market has already discounted the kicking can scenario and even if we go over the cliff, the market knows by early Jan politicians will panic and scramble with some sort of last minute deal. Regardless, just like the Europeans have down for 18 emergency meetings, almost all of them will be non-events.

      - Freeport McMoran did not break down because of Fiscal Cliff as they are a global company which derives earnings mainly and largely connected to Chinese growth.

      Apple did not break down because of Fiscal Cliff. As a matter of fact, the whole technology sector gets more than 50% of their earnings abroad, and with heavy EU exposure tech companies like IBM are also breaking down. Let us remember that Europe is in a recession and earnings are now being hurt.

      McDonalds is breaking down , Kohls is breaking down and Wal Mart is also starting to break down too. These companies are all multi-state / multi-nationals in soem of the biggest economies around the world. Investors are pricing in a global slowdown and that has nothing to do with smoke and mirror media talks about Fiscal Cliff.

      Obviously this is just my opinion, and if you watch CNBC or Bloomberg long enough, and all one hears is "Fiscal Cliff" every 5 seconds, eventually one starts saying "the market fell because of Fiscal Cliff" or "the market rose because there is a deal for Fiscal Cliff". I think that is a load of non sense! *smile*

      ReplyDelete
    27. Tiho,
      i enjoy your blog because of your macro top down view which is backed up with contrarian thinking and technical justification. So i see you as a big picture thinker.

      Therefore i thought i would pose a statement and then question for you and the readers,
      Over the last 40 years you have had to make 1 investment decision every 10 years to turn $35 into $198,000
      They were: Gold 1970 - 80s $35 to $674
      Nikkei 80s - 90s $674 to $3,700
      Nasdaq 90s - 00s $3,700 0 $41,800
      Gold 00s - 10s $41,800 - $198,000
      What is your view given we are nearly 3 years in, to the this investment of the decade?

      Phil R

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Silver. Almost all of my money is in Silver.

        Delete
      2. I tend to agree with you, all the fundamental stars seem to be in alignment for this commodity. Though 2020 might be too long a time span, i could see agricultural products being the final commodity to bubble.

        Silver 2010 - 2012 Dec 2012 89% rise
        S&P Agri index 2010 - Dec 2012 36% rise

        Phil

        Delete
    28. Face it... the guy is a rock star! :-)

      http://c3352932.r32.cf0.rackcdn.com/company_logo/55826_1340197373.jpg

      Mitch

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. He defininltly looks like someone who wouldn't have a problem "having fun" at the Soho meat district after Friday bell close on Wall Street.

        Delete
      2. Tiho beds more women than Chuck Norris!

        Delete
      3. Hahaha! I have a feeling some of the "Anonymous" comments were made by close friends.

        Delete
    29. Tiho, can you please turn of comments for older posts? I subscribed to comments on rss and i get a lot of spam in older entries. You can set moderation in your blog to 'Sometimes' and enter number of days to allow comments.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. I have just edited this feature and have now allowed comments to be made on posts that are only 30 days old. I hope that helps!

        Delete
    30. Tiho: Latest US employment numbers reduces the chance of QE 25 by the US FED?

      Keep up the good work, not a bad site for a rock star.

      ReplyDelete