Monday, December 10, 2012

Currency Market Positioning

Market Notes
Source: Nomura Research / Short Side Of Long
  • Wall Street analysts are quick to make an assumption that the US housing market is in recovery mode, which essentially will be good for economic growth, employment and therefore the stock market too. While I agree that the US housing market definitely offers fundamental value for long term investors, the story isn't that simple. Real estate prices do not necessarily correlate positively with stock prices, so if we were to assume that Wall Street analysts are right and money does flow into the beaten down housing market, the question we should be asking ourselves is where will this money be coming from? The chart above, via Nomura research, shows the US household asset ratio between real estate and all other assets, with overwhelming majority of the "other" being equities.  We can see that households are currently underexposed to real estate and therefore an assumption could be made that this asset will experience favourable attention in the future, relative to others. But, what does that mean for the stock market? Well, last time we saw a similar occurrence, stocks struggled. During 1966 to 1968 as well as during 1998 to 2000, the US equity market peaked out and entered a decade long sideways secular bear market range. Will this time be different? While I do not think US equities will move sideways for another decade, I definitely think we are approaching a major top and a bear market is just around the corner.
Source: Deutsche Bank
  • A lot of investors claim that the US stock market dividend yield has now overtaken the Treasury yield, which should result in improved competitiveness for the stock market, in hopes of attracting more money to push it towards higher levels. While I do not want to get into the overall stock vs bond debate, I am not so sure about this theory. I do admit that government bonds aren't attractive at the current yield at all, especially after a prolonged 30 year Kondratiev bull market. However, just because stocks have a higher dividend yield relative to government bonds for the first time since the 1950s, it does not give us an automatic buy signal. As a matter of fact, dating back to the late 1800s, stocks almost always yielded more than government securities until the 1950s secular change. The truth is, while bond yields are very unattractive, the dividend yield on the stock market is also at historically low levels too. I am not sure if we will see a period of high dividend yields in the US equity space again (towards 5% or higher), but what is needed is one of three outcomes: companies increasing their dividends meaningfully, stock prices falling dramatically or a mixture of both.
Source: Short Side Of Long
  • Global hedge funds, influenced by central bank monetary policy, continue to hold above average bullish bets on the overall commodity space. High exposure to any asset, just like the commodities in this example, usually signals that further upside tends to be limited the majority of the time (but not always). This is because the majority of buyers are already participating and stale longs are forced to sit patiently waiting for prices to rise - and if prices do not rise, a major shake out of weak hands occurs. The majority of technical analysts continue to see a head & shoulders bottom in the CC Index, with a break out above the 600 level signalling a new uptrend, the problem with this view, as we can see through the commitment of traders report, is that the majority of market participants (like hedge funds & other speculators) are expecting the same outcome. So caution should be applied. When we dissect the commodity exposure data into different sectors, we can see that despite a strong correction in price, hedge funds still hold a relatively decent exposure to Agriculture. Furthermore, while not overly bullish, hedge funds still hold modest bullish bets on energy and industrial metals too. Precious metals exposure is definitely more optimistic as well, relative to the summer doldrums experienced this year. While commodity bulls amongst us would prefer hedge funds to be under-exposed and in disbelief right now, which could potentially push prices to higher levels, sentiment isn't extremely optimistic either. There is no clear contrarian edge right now, as we wait for further Fed policy this week.
Source: Short Side Of Long
  • The fight between bulls and bears continues, without a clear winner just yet. Bulls claim the global economy is recovering and finally EU stocks are starting to outperform, while Chinese manufacturing is expanding once again. They say that this is a very good sign. Bears claim that the recovery calls are premature and finally bull market leaders like Apple are breaking down, as earnings are set to disappoint in the not so distant future. One camp is calling for an inflationary growth outcome into 2013, while the other camp is calling for a deflationary recession as early as 2013. So who is right? Who better to ask than the doctor and Phd holder in economics - Dr Copper. It seems that the price has not decided just yet, as we remain in one of the closest and narrowest price ranges since at least 2004. With the majority of Copper demand coming out of Asia, a break out in price could signal a Chinese recovery. On the other hand, a breakdown in price will definitely signal a bulls worst nightmare - a hard landing in Chinese real estate. Keep an eye on the price very closely... as Copper tends to lead global growth.
      Featured Article
      My last post covered the QE4 rumours in circulation, so today I thought I'd gauge the sentiment and positioning of market participants within the currency market before Ben Bernanke and the league of extraordinary central banking gentlemen take stage for one last FOMC meeting for 2012.
      Source: Danske Bank

      Let me just say straight up that this meeting is not as important as some have made it out to be. In all honesty, regardless of whether the Fed starts further easing this week or sometime in early 2013 is absolutely irrelevant to the markets, as they tend to be a discount mechanism. From what we know, the FOMC board of voting members looks super-dovish next year, with cheer-leading money printer Charles Evans joining the voting ranks together with his side-kick Eric Rosengren. It shouldn't be too difficult to figure out what the consensus of the Fed's game plan will look like next year, with Mr Evans and Mr Rosengren recently giving us some hints. Teaming these two new money printers together with some permanent super-doves like Ben BernankeWilliam Dudley & Janet Yellen, and you are sure to get at least up to QE 6 by next year's end. Whether or not these policies will work in pushing up stock and real estate prices remains to be seen, but one thing is for sure - it will definitely cause some serious volatility in the currency markets.
      Source: Nomura Research

      According to the Nomura currency research team, measuring implied volatility on risky currencies such as the Korean Won, Brazilian Real, Turkish Lira, Mexican Peso, Aussie Dollar, South African Rand amongst others is now lower and at more complacent levels than at any other time since at least 2008. Furthermore, currencies like the Mexican Peso and Aussie Dollar hold very high correlation to markets such as the S&P 500, Junk Bonds, Crude Oil, Copper and other "risk on" assets. With volatility so low, let us look at market positioning next.
       Source: Short Side Of Long

      Since the majority of currencies trade first and foremost against the global reserve known as the US Dollar, I always like to start by looking at the overall positioning and sentiment there, before looking at other individual currencies. Looking at the chart above, we can see that market participants were extremely net long the US Dollar around May of this year. You might remember warnings against further Dollar purchases on this blog back around the similar time. What followed was a QE3 sell off and break below the 200 MA for the first time since July of 2011. Now, it seems investors are indecisive on the future trend of the greenback as their positioning is being whipsawed.
      Source: SentimenTrader / Short Side Of Long

      Various sentiment indicators, such as Public Opinion, are also quite neutral too. The Dollar's technical picture has been one of a rising trend channel since the middle of 2011. When the price would retest the resistance of the channel, so would the sentiment and a correction followed. And when the priced would reach the bottom of the channel, so would sentiment and a rally would surprise the majority. Now the Dollar is once again flirting with the support line of the rising channel, but this time around, sentiment is not as bearish as during previous occasions. Can the Dollar rally, despite only neutral sentiment readings, or will we see a break down out of the channel? I'll let Ben Bernanke and the league of extraordinary central banking gentlemen decide that one for me.

       Source: Short Side Of Long

      While the Dollar positioning is not giving us much of an edge (just like many other markets), such low volatility has created a lot of complacency in the markets. One of the side-effects of very small daily price movements is usually seen in the over-bullish positioning of carry traders, those investors who usually bid up higher yielding currencies like the Aussie Dollar while shorting the zero yielders like Japanese Yen. The chart above shows that this week's commitment of traders reported an all time record high bullish bet on the Aussie Dollar, while the positioning in the Japanese Yen is third lowest in its history (with small speculators a.k.a. dumb money at record shorts).
       Source: Short Side Of Long

      Such extreme positioning between risk on currencies like the Aussie and risk off currencies like the Yen, demands attention and definitely warrants caution. The chart above, which I like to call the Carry Trade indicator, shows that current bullish bets on the Aussie Yen has now reached an overly optimistic 2.5 standard deviations away from the mean and since the exchange cross holds very close correlation to the MSCI World Equity Index, what might follow is a serious correction with similarities to April 2010, May 2011 and March 2012.
       Source: Short Side Of Long

      Supporting a case for a major sell off is the relatively large bullish bet on the British Pound, which remains in one of the tightest trading ranges ever seen - a triangular consolation period for over three years. Of course, bulls will claim that the price will break out on the upside, but I am not so sure of that. First of all, hedge funds are positioned for that outcome, so from a contrarian point of view, I'd rather go the other way. 
       Source: FinViz / Short Side Of Long

      More importantly, the Pound is also highly correlated to the S&P 500, but fundamentally tends to move in its own direction over the longer term. We can see in the chart above that the S&P 500 and the British Pound tend to bottom at just about the same time post corrections. Therefore, one can say that the Pound has had its chance to rally since the March 2009 low and has failed to do so. The last highs were made in 2009 and then again in 2011. Now that the equity markets are overbought and the bull market is aged with the global economy slowing down, I am afraid that Pound bulls might be disappointed. If and when the equity market turns down, with the risk off trade dominating the overall conditions, the Pound will most likely be punished with a move back towards the March 2009 lows.

      The currency market seems to be stuck between a rock and a hard place. On one side we have dovish Fed members, who are surely eager and willing to print more US Dollars to post-pone a recession and re-spark some type of economic activity. This tends to be a bearish outcome for the King Dollar and benefits the risk on / inflation trade to some degree. On the other hand, we have extremely complacent volatility with very heavy positioning on either side of the spectrum in both the Aussie and the Yen. Historically, this type of extreme positioning always tends to be mean reverting and could therefore risk asset signal selling directly ahead. The market will decide soon enough

      Disclosure: I have recently shorted the Aussie Dollar, and while already being long Japanese Yen, the trade has now turned into a short Aussie Yen exchange rate cross

      Trading Diary (Last update 09th of December 12)
      • Equities: Short positions are held in various US equity sectors, which include Dow Transports (IYT), Technology (XLK), Discretionary (XLY) and Industrials (XLI). Large put options have been bought on Apple (AAPL). Call options have been sold on Homebuilders (XHB), JP Morgan (JPM), Amazon (AMZN), IBM (IMB), Commonwealth Bank (CBA), Adidas (ADS) and others.
      • Bonds: There isn't a lot of exposure in the bond space, as we believe this sector is experiencing euphoric investor demand. Call options have been sold on Junk Bonds (HYG). Plans to short Long Bond Treasuries (TLT) in due time.
      • Currencies: Long positions are held in Japanese Yen (FXY). Short positions are held in Australian Dollar (FXA). The trade is now essentially short Aussie / Yen cross. Put options have been bought on British Pound (FXB) & Canadian Dollar (FXC). Put options have been sold on Japanese Yen (FXY).
      • Commodities: Long positions are held in various commodity sectors, which include Silver (SLV, SIVR, PSLV, Comex futures), Agriculture (RJA, JJA) and Sugar (SGG). Plans to increase  longs in PMs and Softs in due time.
      What I Am Watching

      59 comments:

      1. yes, it's probably going to be an interesting set of conditions whereby the govt and fed are going to try and stoke things at a time when the mkt is already far from a bottom. the reverse of the bob rubin strategy that has been employed by the big govt crowd since the clinton days.

        of course when they go into re-inflate mode when the mkt is already up, it won't work as well or won't work at all.

        all that will be left at that point is a great big giant pr job on how it is 'all the republicans fault'

        ReplyDelete
      2. You mention that you expect a major Bear market , yet don't say why

        You compare today's market with a 14 p/e , high dividend yield and high cash flow yield to 2000's market with a 35 p/e , historically low dividend yield and low cash flow yield

        ReplyDelete
      3. Tiho,
        Do you ever look at Georg Vrba's work?

        He thinks we are not in a recession
        http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/guest/Georg-Vrba-121207-Unemployment-Rate-and-Recession-Probability.php

        Though he recently exited the S&P 500
        http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/guest/Georg-Vrba-121119-Sell-Signal.php

        ReplyDelete
      4. Dax-Sentiment

        Sentix: +42% bullish reading
        AnimusX: +60% bullish reading
        Cognitrend: 64% bulls vs. 16% bears

        Even the always bearish "Süddeutsche Zeitung" expects the DAX at 8000. And the retail investors at the Euwax also turned bullish.

        And I agree with you Tiho, if everything would be allright, then Apple should lead the market. Vodafone and Royal Dutch Shell are also showing weakness, instead of leading the market. So I go back to the bearish camp.

        Ben

        ReplyDelete
      5. Thanks for another great update...Got a quick question, whats the reasoning behind your CAD short? Is it your views about the commodity space or possible housing troubles in Canada?..have a nice week ahead,
        Emrah

        ReplyDelete
        Replies
        1. C$ is a commodity currency with strong correlation to oil and copper.

          Tiho - the reasoning behind your long JPY/short Aus makes a lot of sense in the context of your chart; i read your piece on the JPY/USD, but the question i have is not the USD a "risk" off currency as well, and why don't you close out your FXY position and add to your long JPY/short AUS.

          Delete
      6. Tiho, about @silver,

        from this presentation
        http://217.161.13.52/media_advisories/TR%20GFMS%20World%20Silver%20Survey%202012%20Presentation.pdf

        in page 41 (and the rest of the presentation), looks like the only upward pressure of silver comes from investment. Nothing related to fundamentals.

        So, the only reason to be super-bullish in silver is the easing of CentralBanks?.


        Best. Santiago

        ReplyDelete
        Replies
        1. Nice presentation and I find it interesting that silver mine supply is out stripping demand (the last of the supply section). Every silver bug newsletter I read says we are running out of silver. Does anyone fact check.

          Delete
        2. @silverbug,

          indeed my main concern on the feasibility of long term investing is the quality of the sources. Probably 90% of newsletters are garbage. One's analysis can be only as good as the quality of inputs one receives.

          Indeed, I'm not sure whether it's possible (realistically for normal people) to do proper long term investments without a huge amount of money to pay for quality sources. Long term investment based on fundamentals is suitable for the normal guy?.

          Best. Santiago

          Delete
        3. There is lots of very good free information out there as well as bad. You just need to have a healthy dose of cynicism and experience. You can gain experience at a much quicker rate by reading (the right material) and acting on that knowledge. Nothing is easy in investing it takes lots of hard work.

          Delete
      7. Tiho a few questions for you
        1. Ccan you comment on the rule of 20 equity valuation. I agree with your bond yield to dividend yield arguement but this seems interesting valuation method.
        http://www.news-to-use.com/2012/10/pes-qes-saudis.html
        http://www.news-to-use.com/2010/11/the-rule-of-20-equity-valuation-method.html

        2. Regarding the economy what about a very slow but slight positive growth outlook for GDP. I agree the economy is slowing but why not a more shallow market correction provided the government continues spending to support the economy.

        3. Good to hear about your Aussie dollar perspective and what do you make of Junk bond making a new highs which go against your more bearish market view?

        ReplyDelete
      8. Thank you for all the nice comments. Let me try and answer a few questions:

        JJ McIntyre - Yes I see a major bear market coming. I have explode why and the regular readers of the blog already understand my point of view, so there is no need to explain it every post. For more information regarding this outlook, use the menu on the side to see the recent posts. Looking at today's P/E of 14 to the P/E in 200 might make stocks look attractive, but I will not be buying stocks until they enter single digits and have on more bear market.

        Anonymous December 10 @ 4:27 AM - No I am not familiar with Georg Vrba. I do not have time to read his thoughts today, but looking over ti quickly, he is comparing the current business cycle with the previous two cycles. One needs to use a lot more historical data than just a recession from 2001 to understand what is happening and where we are. I highly recommend reading some of the Ray Dalio or Rogoff & Reinhart work. This is not your normal business cycle.

        Ben - Always good to hear from you and the recent sentiment update for German shares. Recent data out of Germany, including Industrial Production as well as Retail Sales looks very very weak. I am certain that German is on a cusp of a recession. I maintain my view that DAX 30 is topping and 2013/14 will not be favourable.

        Emrah - My reason for shorting commodity currencies like Loonie has less to do with Canadian fundamentals and more to do with US fundamentals. I believe when US enters a recession and the whole world slows down, their next door trading partners like Canada and Mexico - as well as their currencies - will be hurt meaningfully. So a recession in the US would mean weak Loonie and strong US Dollar. furthermore, Canadian Dollar has a very high correlation with the S&P 500 - more so than Oil or Copper.

        Anonymous December 10 @ 11:50 AM - being long JPY/USD (long FXY) and short AUD/USD (short FXA) is essentially a short Aussie long Yen play anyway. When you go short FXA and long FXY, you are actually holding the short on a Aussie Yen cross pair.

        Santiago - demand and supply isn't just gauged by today's fundamentals. I have repeated many times no this blog that a good investors needs to have an ability to anticipate and envision what fundamentals will look like in the future, 6 to 12 months ahead... sometimes years ahead. You see maybe supply overwhelms demand right now, but when we have another financial crisis, which I am envisioning and anticipating, CBs around the world will print so much money that demand will skyrocket. That will really create a currency crisis and a loss in confidence from your everyday Joe Blow on the streets. Public will become suspect of fiat currencies. At that point, demand will outstrip supply and shortages will put huge pressure on all commodities including Silver. The current supply will look like a small drop in the ocean. As for current demand supply fundamentals - don't worry about that... they are already priced into the market. Your job is not to comment on the present, to anticipate the future and invest accordingly.

        ReplyDelete
      9. silverbug - yes you are right, but the market doesn't concern itself with the current facts, but future facts. Current facts have already made price of Silver half since May 2011 @ $50 towards @ $26 in June 2012. Can you tell us what happens next?

        ecocomm - I do not use the rule of 20 valuation. It is too random for me. I stick to P/B and CAPE10 valuations. I do read news-to-use.com and I think it is a very cool blog! Regarding the economy, I see a recession and no government stimulus will be able to stop it from occurring eventually - they can just keep posting for awhile longer. I am short Junk Bonds via options market and they haven't made a new high as they remain around the same level as in May 2011 - chart here.

        The only people that think Junk Bonds have made a new high are the ones that do not understand the total return of price plus dividend yields like Stock Charts shows. Looking at the price of Junk Bonds on its own... it is actually being going sideways for over 3 years now without any gain. It is only a matter of time until we have a major sell off and a VIX spike.

        I hope that helps answer all the questions!

        p.s. great game between Man Utd and Man City last night 3-2. Anyone watch it?

        ReplyDelete
      10. Yes watched the game it was a cracking match, though it was a late one (living in Aus.). It was a different game once Tevez replaced Balotelli. Disappointed City lost however.

        On the softs, looks as though coffee is trying to make a wedge break. If it can follow through i am expecting a mirror performance in sugar.

        Phil

        ReplyDelete
        Replies
        1. Seems mother nature wants to let everyone drink cheap coffee so that they can be wide awake to witness the end of the world :)

          Delete
        2. however throwing coins at players and fans invading the pitch is even more disapointing to an ex Brit living in the USA
          Brian

          Delete
        3. Yeah that was disappointing to see.

          Delete
      11. Tiho,
        Re shorting CAD it could be a good idea as Carney has blown up a household debt bubble. If he hadn't he wouldn't have got the job with the other debt junkies at the Bank of England.

        http://www.crackshackormansion.com/
        http://canadabubble.com/

        Whoever takes over in Canada is going to have to be good at keeping their balance walking on banana skins!

        ReplyDelete
      12. Kong is freakin hilarious this morning and a must read:

        http://www.forexkong.com

        Things are lining up for the dollar slide.

        ReplyDelete
        Replies
        1. Heres something for everybody here to think about. I picked the bottom in March 09.

          Delete
      13. I think we are having our Santa Rally in the London and US markets - of course, that could change any second with a loose word from either side of the US fiscal cliff parties.

        But it looks like the can will be kicked down the road and, if and when that becomes 100% certain, I can see the DOW leading markets higher - DOW up to 13,500 again and perhaps higher.

        I write all this as a perma bear who believes that a sizeable correction is coming in US and UK equities that will take down the rest of the world - problem is, it might be pushed back several months now because of some kind of fiscal cliff can kicking.

        ReplyDelete
      14. Tiho, I just wanted to take some time to say thank for your for consistently well formed analysis. As an individual investor, much of my information selection process involves reading material both from the permabulls and permabears in an attempt to filter the noise from the signal. A lot of that noise is usually a general theory that uses one or two datasets (think NFP or housing starts charting) to predict the future of the entire market. You're one of the few that I can consistently count on to provide a broader macro view, not to mention a historic context.

        I've got a number of similar trades as you right now, such being bearish on high yields, discretionaries and homebuilders. While I feel these still have upside possibilities and might require a stop out, I believe a downside would be significant move if it happened.

        Anyhow, thanks again for your thoughts. It's appreciated.

        ReplyDelete
      15. Replies
        1. You are a genius, without any doubt you will own the whole world.

          Delete
      16. Dec 11, 2013 10:45 EST

        This could be the last hurrah for the market. The market is in a minor frenzy at the opening today. I have a couple of theories about why.

        First, it is reacting to market news and the "belief" that the politicians will cut some kind of a closed door deal and make an announcement before they go home to their Xmas and New Years parties (not to be confused with their daily partying in D.C. on our tax dollars). Once the news is out that a deal has been cut, whether or not the deal is a good one or bad one, then the markets will slowly start to get real again about the economic prospects for 2013 and that should result in a soft market for the early part of 2013.

        Second, and on a longer term basis, this bull market is very long in the tooth. Could we have one more consecutive up year in 2013? I would not bet my house or any of the portfolios that I run on it. If we get a year end rally due to a phony Fiscal Cliff Crisis deal that gets folks pumped up into buying stocks for a few days, and which might very well bring the market up to a point that is just shy of 1474 on the S&P, then I suspect that the high for the year in 2013 could very well be seen during the first week or two of January. If we were to break through 1474, then I would have to rethink my position as the market would be telling me that I am missing something and that this bull market is still intact. For the time being I am still operating under a thesis that the market is going to start to roll over here based primarily on my belief that tax policies going forward are going to induce a recession or at best a renewed period of stagflation, as the Fed continues to print money and to artificially keep interest rates down in order to try to fend off a debt collapse here in the U.S.

        Again, for several years now the so-called "january effect" has been coming in December, so that might give a further boost to stock prices as we head toward the end of December and into the first week or two of January. But once that buying runs its course, I do not see any basis for the market to remain optimistic, once the economic scenario that will play itself out in 2013 is realized by market participants. Hence, come early 2013, I am still anticipating at a minimum the onset of a steep correction and possibly even the start of a new bear market. The time frame for that bear market I am not certain of, of course, (and who can be?), except to say that it begins early 2013. When it ends will depend on how the market perceives future economic recovery once the recession has begun.
        Remember, we still never had the double dip that everyone was talking about a couple of years ago. We had one in the 30's. Despite Fed monetary policy and the purported Keynesian policies of the Obama Administration, we have seen a very modest recovery from 2008-2009. But the current proposed tax policies might very well be the repetition of poor economic policy that caused the double dip of the 30's and could very well spark the double dip that I have been keeping an eye out for, as we move into 2013.
        Therefore, I continue to remain cautious and unwilling to commit fresh money to the market and continue to keep my core long equity positions hedged by either a certain percentage of each overall portfolio being either short or in cash, depending on the risk profile of each portfolio.

        ReplyDelete
        Replies
        1. I all fairness Gary was right with his call. I'm completely unable to follow any of his reasonings, but I was right.

          Looks like will have a V bottom for a while.

          Best. Santiago

          Delete
        2. arrjd I concur and I think early Jan will be ugyly.

          Delete
        3. If Gary's call was to be right for 3 weeks, than I guess he was right for those 3 weeks. However, I believe his call is that the S&P 500 is going into a speculation phase or a blow off top towards a margin new all time high of 1600 or so well into 2013. So if Gary's call is a blow off rally into mid 2013, one cannot claim he is right just yet. We will have to wait on that one...

          Delete
        4. I subscribe to Gary's service and the trading account is well under water and heavily leveraged in GDX. Take a look at what happened the miners in Nov and Dec and you can imagine the pain subscribers are in. He may have called the SPX bottom but he choose to have 0% SPX exposure and largely played the rally with mining and some silver shares/options which corrected heavily.

          Also, if you follow him you will find his postings are sensational and simply to generate more subscribers in my view. He is probably profitable in the long term but you have to deal with massive drawdowns in the options and etfs along the way.

          Delete
        5. Fair enough. I remember the consensus view in late September and whole of October that Gold will rapidly move towards $1900 while Gold Mining shares explode towards 2011 highs. I wrote the complete opposite here on the blog, one of the reasons behind my view I used was the heavy expectations of rapid price appreciation by so many bloggers. Some of you might remember this chart here from my post on 20th of October. Furthermore, this is what I wrote:

          "As cash levels swell up in my fund, in the coming weeks or months, I will consider adding exposure to the PMs sector again. After all, in a bull market, we are meant to be buying (sounds simple, but many forget this basic rule). However, I won't just buy at any point or any price. I would like to see some or maybe even all of the following criteria, before I add further funds to this asset class:

          - sentiment surveys falling below neutrality (currently too high)
          - hedge fund reducing futures positioning (currently on high side)
          - market open interest speculation declining (rose too rapidly)
          - retail crowd hot money leaving ETFs (currently too high)
          - increase in ETFs short interest ratio activity (currently too low)
          - large Put purchase levels relative to Calls (currently too low)

          Finally, a major buy signal would be to see some of the consensus bloggers and technical analysts, who were predicting $1900 Gold as recently as a few weeks ago, to start doubting Gold's uptrend because their Elliot Wave counts, cycle frameworks and various technical indicators break down rapidly."

          Delete
        6. Ctrader:

          I am a former Gary's service subscriber as well.....so disappointed of his bad calls and his arrogance. That guy will make you lose money for sure.
          Stay away. Tiho seems to offer a more technical and comprehensive market view.

          Pibe

          Delete
        7. Talking about underwater positions. Tiho's shorts are under water, so are his fx positions and sugar. I guess no one is perfect ;]

          Delete
        8. The issue is not about being right or wrong it is what you do about it that counts.

          Delete
        9. I think that gold bugs are heavily positioned in gold mining stocks and that's where surprise is waiting for them. I believe gold stocks are very poor investement in gold bubble. Same thing happened in 1970's

          http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_08/saville051011.html

          Delete
        10. I agree history shows for the average investor it is best to stick to the physical, rather than put your money in a company that is being run for the benefit of the directors rather than the investors.

          Delete
        11. Pibe. The last time Gary played the stock market he used the TVIX as a short which fell to over 50% before it corrected. He never realized that it was being shorted by hedge funds to extract the premium. And even after members asked him, he remained stubborn. Now he never bring it up. After that I realized he is more lucky then good. Gold has been in decade long bull market. And it is not hard to do well in a bull market. The better traders are also able to navigate the markets when their is a short term bear.

          Delete
        12. Not all my shorts are underwater for starters. Dow Transports is slightly but Tech sector is not. Furthermore Apple is a very large short of my fund, with large NAV exposure and that is not underwater but showing a handsome position. Industrial sector is underwater and so is the Yen too. Sugar is also, but that is a small position. Biggest position by far and away is Silver and this is up over 20% currently. However, all of what I have stated is pointless, because one should be judged when they CLOSE their position, so hopefully I'm smart enough to know what I'm doing and I close my position for a profit in the future.

          Delete
        13. @Joell Donovan,

          http://smartmoneytracker.blogspot.com.es/

          I know him since he blogged freely, as Tiho is doing now. At that period he was very focused reading the COT tea leaves. Later he realized that is easier to make money from fees than from markets, as eventually all bloggers do.

          I remember beginning in trading reading him. I go from time to time to his blog, with a feeling to know what's up with an old friend. I remember him like a good guy, I don't know now.

          I'm unable to read anymore one of his articles. Anyway I've been able to learn from him two things: i) reading a bit of the COT, ii) I should have payed attention to him with his crazy calls on gold and silver, when gold was << $1000. I realized he was right too late.

          Santiago

          Delete
      17. All you need to know about the Fiscal Cliff is in the commentary written by the great Art Cashin of UBS. For those of Tiho's followers here who don't know who he is, let me just say he is one of the wisest men ever to grace the floor of the NYSE.

        http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-12-11/art-cashin-previews-our-202-trillion-destiny

        ReplyDelete
      18. There is a lot of comments about Fiscal Cliff. I think that the is a non event and only something for media to talk about. Media continues to link every sell off and every rally to the Fiscal Cliff. That is not true from my perspective, so I think traders are not focusing at what is really happening behind the scenes (just like always). Personally, I do not think Fiscal Cliff has anything to do with the recent market sell off and or current V reversal rally.

        The market has moved up out of oversold levels in rapid fashion on the back of QE4 by the Fed. It seems that the recent 5 to 6% rally has been discounting Fed's next chess move. I am pretty sure media just attributes any rally or sell off to politicians and the Fiscal Cliff, while the market has been busy discounting bad earnings on the bear side and the Fed announcement of Treasury purchases on the bull side. It's a tug of war, in my opinion.

        ReplyDelete
        Replies
        1. Tiho, take a look at this article:
          http://vixandmore.blogspot.com/2012/12/unusual-twist-in-vix-futures-term.html

          Seems like market is pricing fiscal cliff as risk event.

          Delete
      19. Too add my 2 pennies, my equities model has ticked up to a buy today, ive been on a sell since 24th Oct. A lot of the metrics i track including a number of those charts on Tiho's site have taken a positive turn over the last week and a half. If it is correct, it looks as though we may have further upside potential before any potential selloff.

        I have no idea how long this signal may last for.
        This is just my humble opinion, DYOR.
        Phil

        ReplyDelete
        Replies
        1. About the potential selloff I've not a clue. But internals of market, measured as breadth and momentum, are good now. I guess traders are finding nice setups to position for breakouts. Market is pointing upwards, doesn't matter how one looks at it.

          Santiago

          Delete
      20. Santiago, i agree with you, breadth & momentum are positive so hence market is looking is positive in the short term. Very difficult to predict how long this upturn could last for, but the long term charts as Tiho displays show we should see an equity turndown, especially as a ratio against real assetts.
        Phil

        ReplyDelete
      21. Dear Tiho,
        It's always a pleasure to read your articles.
        I am currently short the equity markets(10% of NAV in S&P and 20% in Dax)and although I timed my entries rather well it is certainly not pleasant to see such euphoric rises. Anyway I remain strongly convinced that a bear market is upon us and in fact plan to roughly double my short exposure,by adding NDX and increasing my S&P and Dax positions.I also opened massive Yen longs(mainly against bubble currencies),since as you pointed out that's the only place in the currency markets where significant sentiment and positioning extremes can be found. So far I'm getting egg on my face, but it has been my experience that major turning points are by no means difficult to spot, but rather difficult to endure as the crowd goes strongly(and irrationally)in the direction of the current trend, stubbornly ignoring the shifting fundamental landscape.
        The dollar is quite difficult to read at the moment,as different factors combine to produce a very uncertain outcome. However I tend to think that any breakdowns are likely to be fake moves,given the generally bearish sentiment and an infamous "Head and Shoulders top" that many muppets leader/handlers claim is forming in the Dollar index(it even has an upslanting neckline to boot...).
        I am long sugar and I am considering adding coffee,as it is starting to become interesting and appears to be bottoming.
        Finally,I'd like to see a nice flush in the PMs to purge all the muppets stubbornly holding on to their positions. Hopefully the Fed will provide the excuse today.
        http://images.wikia.com/spongefan/images/d/dd/Kermit.jpg
        "Oh no!", says Kermit "Look at GDX!It's gapping down!Better run for the exits!"

        ReplyDelete
      22. Thank you for all the nice comments!

        By the way, is there anyone who thinks Fed will NOT deliver another program and actually is appoint is for a couple of months? Or is everyone in the "$45 billion per month of Treasuries boat?"

        ReplyDelete
        Replies
        1. I don't know honestly.I'd love to see them disappoint,but I am not sure they will.In any case I think the risk of them holding back from such purchases is higher than the market seems to discount.

          Delete
      23. Bernanke speaks here in the USA in less than 4 hours from when I write this post. I am anticipating a continuation of QE Infinity. He has no choice.

        I agree that the so-called Fiscal Cliff mantra from the press is intended to keep their ratings up on CNBC and other news reports.

        The average American is finally starting to ask questions but even they don't believe it and consider it just another bunch of political nonsense. I speak from the anecdotal evidence of speaking to many people during the course of my day.

        The real fiscal cliff is really a year or two from now when the 17 trillion dollar national debt can not be covered, and by then it could very well be 18 to 10 trillion dollars of debt as the increased tax rates that will be passed will probably result in lower tax revenues, as it always does. as the country is pushed into a recession.

        The next real data to be on the look out for is any new earnings guidance from companies and if they start to lower their guidance.Then look to see if the analysts start to revise downward their earnings estimates.

        Lastly, let's see what 4th quarter earnings look like when there is reporting in January. Lower actual earnings, which comes on the heels of a not so great 3rd quarter, ought to start to drive the stake into the heart of the stock market.

        Is anyone seriously looking for sterling earnings reports in January? Isn't it interesting that the liberal press doesn't speak on this issue? Of course not, they don't want to be accused of being negative. They want to continue to promote their own liberal agenda and that of the Democrats, who they assisted in the election. Like the iron lady, Maggie Thatcher once said, liberal policies work really well until you run out of other people's money.

        ReplyDelete
        Replies
        1. arrjd,

          "Lastly, let's see what 4th quarter earnings look like when there is reporting in January. Lower actual earnings, which comes on the heels of a not so great 3rd quarter, ought to start to drive the stake into the heart of the stock market"

          I wish you are right... but if Ben goes to QE Infinity the risk assets will go up infinity as well. If only earnings were the driving force, life would be easier.

          Best. Santiago

          Delete
        2. Santiago,

          There are two primary things that drive stock prices: 1. earnings; 2. sentiment.

          Sentiment is the macro picture and drives the entire market or various sectors of the market, as the market is given to rotational periods. An increased money supply and therefore increased liquidity does affect the macro picture.

          Earnings are the micro picture pertaining to each company. Earnings are of course affected by overall economic conditions, for the most part (there are always exceptions) and at the end of the day it is ultimately earnings growth that drives a stock's price higher, so long as sentiment is not working counter to overall stock prices and driving down overall market values.

          Not to be argumentative with you, I do not subscribe to the theory that unlimited growth of the money supply, that results, ultimately, in either the intended or unintended consequences, of inflationary pressure, always results in higher stock prices, at least in the short term.

          Eventually inflation affects all prices, including stock and other asset prices (as does deflation have the converse effect) but that does not produce real returns. It produces merely nominal returns of value. Thus, at the end of the day, we are all even.

          Preferably, a stable monetary policy that produces a stable currency that is neither inflationary or deflationary, produces real wealth. But politicians, including those who sit on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and especially its Chairman, have other considerations than preserving the value of the currency. Why do you think the Fed has a dual mandate? A pure and non-political Fed only needs a single mandate. Then they can let free enterprise and sound governmental policies do what is needed to promote economic growth. Not to be unduly repetitious, there are no pure economists (ex. Krugman), but merely economists who have underlying agendas to promote their own personal social policies. ARRJD




          Delete
        3. @arrj

          it's always interesting reading you. My point was just that the FED has the amazing capability of increasing the price of risk assets as much they want. I think that's true, is there any upper bound for its balance sheet?.


          Returning to the markets. Do you understand today's action, silver up big time, same as miners, but GOLD struggling.

          BTW in July I made a big purchase in GLD, if I just had looked at the long term chart of GLD:SLV I would have bought SLV. The ratio GLD:SLV is clearly decreasing on the long term.

          Best. Santiago

          Delete
        4. Santiago,
          The Fed is in new and uncharted waters with the build up of their balance sheet. I don't think anyone knows what the limit is. I don't think it is infinity. I don't believe the markets would accept that. At some point there must be some limit to the upper boundary of its balance sheet. I have yet to read any analysis or study about that yet.
          I rely on logic and plain old common sense. I suppose common sense did in fact cause people to believe that the world was flat at one time. But the folks who did not accept the popular consensus and conducted their own analysis eventually went out to prove the truth, to wit: that the earth was a globe circling the sun and not the reverse.
          It seems to me that the current popular consensus in monetary theory thinks the world is economically flat all the way to infinity. We will know soon enough if they are right or wrong. I am betting that their monetary folly will re-produce the same results as the kings of olden times who used to tinker with the amount of silver in the coins that they would stamp out for use by the general public. In the end, those civilizations were taken over and replaced by other more fiscally practical societies, although usually after the barbarians came through the front and back doors.
          History does repeat itself. All that changes is the technology. The printing press gave us paper currency. Current technology is replacing that with electronic currency. At the push of a button, the Fed creates money out of thin air.
          Yes, it can create an infinite amount of money. But eventually, who is going to want to hold onto an electronic dollar bill that is only one of an infinite amount of other electronic dollar bills. Therefore, after the electronic barbarians take over and trash the country producing such electronic currency, then a new civilization will take over that has a sound money policy. Hmmmmmm, China???? The new reserve currency for the world? How about in less than 15 years at the rate the dollar is being trashed.
          Yes, history repeats itself. Even economic history. Unfortunately, we don't teach American History any more. Young folks in my country are growing up knowing nothing about the founding fathers, the importance of property rights in the establishment of America and the importance of having a republic and not a pure democracy in order to protect the rights of the minority. No, the sad fact is that history is thought to begin with the advent of the Rolling Stones. Hence, most kids who go to college in America want to be communications majors and be the next great commentator on ESPN. A sad commentary to say the least.
          Let's see if 2013 is going to be a pivotal year for the US dollar and the US stock market. If I am wrong, I still have my core positions. And if I am right, I have my hedged positions still on to the short side of the equation. And since I believe in a diversified portfolio, I feel that I have protected myself as well as I can.
          Too many folks make one sided and one way "bets." Too many folks who are in the market have "gamblers" mentality. That is why 90 percent of retail investors and traders lose money to we 10% who are professionals and who perform in the market place completely without letting our emotions control our thinking. It is all about logic and common sense. When emotion does start to take hold, that is when I take a vacation, regroup and re-energize. There are times when one must walk away from the day to day grind and noise of the market place. The typical retail trader does that only after he/she has lost all of their money and go home mad preaching forever that the markets are rigged. Actually, the little guy can outperform most, if not all of the big guys, except for those who are acting illegally on inside information or who may be frontrunning their own clients. Good investing/trading. ARRJD

          Delete
      24. Using another 'contrarian' reasoning. Stock ownership is decreasing on time

        from ritholtz

        http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/NA-BU007_SCREAM_G_20121211074509.jpg

        investors have seen recently two mayor sell-offs, so maybe the majority is excepting a big third one to buy cheap. So that won't happen to fool everybody!.

        Ok, just driving crazy with this rally.

        Best. Santiago

        ReplyDelete
      25. Thank you for all comments. New post is up.

        ReplyDelete
      26. Thanks for nice post, i like your post and i wan't to share with my friends.your blog is very nice and i like it. sell without equity information for visit this website-Avoid The Foreclosure Process

        ReplyDelete