Friday, October 5, 2012

Off Topic: A Letter To A Friend

A friend emailed me yesterday regarding the state of financial markets. He happens not to be a client of my fund, but nevertheless the advice and effort I give to him and his family is one similar to that of my clients too. I've attended university with his two older brothers, who happen to be very, very close friends of mine, but they do not share interest in the investment world as much as he does. His father has given him the responsibility of investing the family's capital, as they own a large consumer staples business in the Asia Pacific region and are very well off. The gentleman emailed me regarding stock prices, Australian real estate prices and Precious Metals. Today's post is a "one-off" where I will copy and paste a letter to a friend regarding investment advice. For obvious reasons, certain private parts, family discussions, names, greetings, side chat and other sensitive information has been removed / edited for the sake of privacy. Enjoy!

When it comes to advice for the financial markets, there is a reason why the majority of people in this business lose money consistently, while only a handful are successful and make a profit on a consistent basis. These clowns come on TV channels like Bloomberg and CNBC and they all sound the same. I think I always say this to you, but I'll repeat it again: when it comes to financial advice, the best thing to do is to do your own research and run your own investments. It is basic advice, but it is very, very important. That way you lose your own money if you make mistakes, or if you do your homework and have a little luck, you make your own profits. Listening to financial "gurus / bloggers / experts / traders" who think they know everything, for the majority of time is a complete waste, and this includes me too. 

I can be just as wrong as the common man on the street. As a matter of fact, because I spend a large amount of time in front of the computer reading, researching and studying all of this "stuff", the common man on the street probably knows a lot more about the economy than I do. I am talking about the common man that runs a business and isn't brainwashed by all these financial reports we read daily. That is because visiting local restaurants and night clubs, or just asking various taxi drivers how business is going can tell you a lot more than government statistics - which are all phoney anyway. And on that note, I can give you advice on what I see in the market place today and what I am doing with my money, but in the end I am no better than you or anyone else, so read as much as you can from as many people as you can and in the end, always think clearly by yourself. 

On the stock market...

So when it comes to stock prices I can tell you my view: every man and his dog is optimistic, positive, strongly invested and quite complacent. That to me is a cocktail of trouble! Let me explain...

Source: Short Side Of Long

Investors today are positive about corporate profits and earnings moving even higher than right now. They are also positive about corporate margins expanding even further (see the first chart above). But... let me tell you that earnings are already at record highs and so are corporate margins. No one ever got rich buying stocks when profit margins were at or close to all time highs. Notice that all the best investment opportunities and major market bottoms occurred when margins collapsed, like in 1974, 1982, 2002 and 2009 etc etc. When margins are depressed and earnings have collapsed due to a recession, stocks offer a great entry point and you get to catch the whole recovery. When you hear a lot of opinions regarding how positive fundamental picture is because "profits are at record highs" - that type of a parrot talk can usually be heard from all financial advisors and "gurus / experts" on TV near the peak of the stock market. Look at the chart above and see how profit margins peaked during the 2006/07 period. Now focus on the chart below:
Source: JP Morgan / Barry Ritholtz

Notice that from 2002 to 2007, the US Stock marked gained 100% and it did it during a huge credit boom, housing boom, Chinese boom, commodity boom and manufacturing boom. In 2006 and 2007, the world was in tip top shape and every analyst would have told you that things will continue into the blue skies… almost forever. And that was precisely when the market peaked out, just as the profit margins started to decline. Fast forward to today and the market has now gained 113% in even less time, rising even more rapidly and yet profit margins are at all time record high. That means, it is not probable that they will go even higher and most likely will do the opposite and mean revert downwards. Remember in capitalism, profit margins always mean revert. Currently, the market is driven by central bank's printing money and stimulating financial assets. This has forced a lot of speculation into the market, and yet constantly market participants argue that "there is a lot of cash on the sidelines" and that "funds are underinvested". Let me tell you that the market doesn't gain 113% in three years because everyone is underinvested and there is cash on the sidelines. How the hell did it get there, all by itself?
Source: Short Side Of Long

Furthermore, the majority of investors are now optimistic on stocks and have "made some profits" (as you yourself said in the email) after an almost vertical rally in recent months. But away from the short term, what really surprises me today is the way the majority are strongly invested, quite complacent and not worried about anything. Notice that the US stock market has rallied over 110% in the space of three and half years from its lows in March 2009. The time to be an optimist has long passed. It was wise to be one back in late 2008 and early 2009, when profit margins and earnings collapsed. Back than, retail investors as well as "mum and pop" investors held large amount of cash on the sideline due to fear (chart above shows cash levels reached over 40% of the portfolio on average). 

Today everybody is an optimist, even the bears are slightly invested, but the stock market rally of 110% plus has largely discounted the majority of good news such as record profits and record profit margins. Today, these same investors hold very small amounts of cash on the sideline due to greed, herding and being over exposed (chart above shows cash levels are now at 18% of the portfolio on average). You will notice that whenever cash levels drop, stocks tend to correct almost always. At the same time, when retail investors sell stocks and raise cash… now that is when it is the best time to invest. That is when you will see me excited. As I always say, you are either a contrarian or a casualty. Warren Buffet could tell you a thing or two regarding the sentiment and the chart above: "Attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful" ~ Warren Buffet

On the Precious Metals...

So the question is, if the stock market is not a good place to invest right now, could Gold or Silver present opportunities? Last time we talked, I told you that I wasn't doing anything. The reason for that has not changed. Europe is still a mess and Greece or even Spain is heading towards a default of some type that will shock the system similar to 2008. I know that almost everyone doesn't hold that opinion anymore, but I still do. I also didn't do anything because I remain fully invested in Precious Metals, including Silver. That means I rather not buy extra than is necessary and overexpose myself. Nevertheless, Silver has rallied from $26 to $35 from the middle of August towards the end of September, which is an impressive 35%. So since I am fully invested in this asset and the majority of my clients money is held there, my fund is up rather handsomely for the year (so far). 
Source: Deutsche Bank

Obviously, if Silver falls so will my performance. As wise men say, good times never last forever, so I understand that the recent rally has been a too far, too quick type of a move and could correct slightly in the coming weeks and months. But, regardless of what happens in a few months from here, I believe Gold and Silver will go much much higher in the next few years and I remain a long term investor in this asset class. During a bull market or a boom, the best thing to do is to exercise patience. Besides, when I look at an average portfolio of an investment fund, I notice that stocks are commonly about 37%, bonds are even higher at 49% (bond bubble anyone?), money markets (aka cash levels) are currently at 9% - which I already stated is extremely and dangerously low for an overbought stock market, and finally Gold is only at 1% of exposure. This makes me think that Gold is not in a bubble as investors are still largely under-exposed to this asset class. When I hear constant chatter on Bloomberg and CNBC from these so called "gurus" on how funds now hold 10% or 20% of their money in Gold, that is when I will become worried… and if and when Gold prices go high rapidly, I will most likely sell out. That is because, almost everybody will be super-bullish at that point.
Source: Merrill Lynch / Ann Bartels Technicals

Regarding your question about technicals of Gold, an investment friend in the Merrill Lynch technical team, who sends me regular newsletters regarding asset price movements, also talks about the resistance of $1,800 for Gold and how the price will rally once it "breaks" above that level. They also talk about Gold moving towards $3,000 in the next several quarters or years, according to their chart. I don't really know what to tell you in the short term. Short term market movements are like gambling and probability. It could go up, but it might not. It seems to be that a lot of investors are focused on these "technical levels" anticipating a breakout… the same levels you discussed in your email. In my experience, I've learned that it is not wise to focus on things that everyone else focuses on, because usually markets surprise and do something completely different. And it has also come to my attention, that in the near term, investors are too optimistic about Gold and Silver.
Source: Short Side Of Long

The retail crowd seems to have positioned for this breakout and a lot of speculation and hot money has flown into Gold recently. The chart above shows physical holdings in the major ETF trading product have exploded, so take note that whenever a majority rush into something, it is never wise to buy and the same goes for Gold. I'm also fortunate to read a few newsletters from various investment banks and also individual traders. Technical guys who run these "shorter term" publications are all anticipating a breakout above $1,800 and are decently positioned for it.

I am not saying Gold cannot move higher, all I am saying is that personally I would not buy right here right now. I'd rather wait for a pullback or wait for a setup where the retail investors sell Gold so I can "buy when others are fearful" as Mr Buffett himself wisely stated. You see, Gold has good fundamentals and reasons to why it is rising (unlike the stock market). As central banks print money, maybe even more investors will rush in and Gold might not even pullback. After all, my long term view is that Gold will go much higher. So while I am not selling my Precious Metals due to a good long term outlook, I am also refraining from buying today and tomorrow, due to the short term "froth and heat" in the market.

If I miss the move, then I miss the move… no big deal. There is always another opportunity and that is one thing I've learned in this game. Another chance is just around the corner. Same goes for Silver, as Silver follows Gold rather closely, but just with larger downswings and larger upswings. If I had to buy one of the two, I'd rather buy Silver because it is cheaper on a historical basis. Silver is still 30% below its all time peak of $50, while Gold is very close to new all time highs. That makes me think that Silver has some catching up to do. Therefore, holding both with the longer term view is still fine in my opinion.

On the Economy and Australian real estate...

Finally, read my recent blog post, which argues that we are now on the edge of a global rescission (link here). When I look at Asia, it has been the powerhouse of the recent recovery out of the 2008 recession. However, their export volume is now declining, which signals to me that their customers - which are US and Europe - are showing signs of a slowdown and weak demand.
Source: Merrill Lynch

This has also been true when we look at global economic barometers like Crude Oil or the price of Copper, both of which are struggling. Let us not forget that marginal demand for these industrial commodities comes from the Asian expansion and growth. Greece barely consumes Copper or Oil, so when the price declines it is because something is not well with China, even though those clowns on TV constantly keep saying Eurozone this and Eurozone that, blaming a small tiny economy like Greece for the world's problems.

Source: Bloomberg

I got a Standard Chartered research note the other day, which covers Chinese Copper inventories in various ports near the South / East side of the country. There is idle stockpiles of copper everywhere and it keeps building up. This is a sign that economic activity is very low and slow in certain areas, because Copper is used in almost all building processes, as you probably know yourself. As all prices move on the premise of demand and supply, whenever demand decreases and supply increases, that tends to be the mortal enemy of future price action. When activity slows and the economy stalls, inventories build up and prices decline. Iron Ore inventories at Chinese ports are also through the roof too.

The Iron Ore fundamentals of demand and supply are even worse as prices have crashed recently. As you know well, Iron Ore is a main component of steel making and Australia's main export commodity. At the same time, China is the biggest producer of steel in the world, and therefore Australia's No 1 customer.

The Australian trade balance has now turned into a deficit as the mining boom slows further. That means, Australia is once again importing more goods and services than it is exporting. This weakens capital as it slowly leaves the country and it could most likely weaken the currency too. The slowdown will surely affect the economy. I also happen to think that government revenues will now fall, which could mean higher taxes for us, as the government will need to raise more money elsewhere. All in all, it does not signal great things ahead for the overvalued and overhyped Australian housing bubble.

You might already know that I am rather negative on this asset class and a hold a friendly bet over drinks and dinner, with a close family friend, who's family owns and manages a large private commercial and residential property trust in Australia in excess of $100 million dollars. He believes that Australia real estate prices will move sideways and do not have large downside risks. I hope for the sake of everyone in Australia that he is right. Furthermore, I am also quite aware that certain "experts" out of local investment banks, are now talking about how a mining boom end, signals a housing boom re-start (link here). 
Source: Trading Economics / Short Side Of Long

I personally do not think so and quite honestly, I think such thinking is slightly nuts (as in crazy). Australia has not had a recession for 21 years, while normal business cycles tend to last between 5 to 8 years. As we all should know, recessions are common reoccurrence for the economy to clean itself out and remove excesses. It just makes me think that excesses that have been built into the Australian economy are rather large these days, because it has not been cleaned out for 21 years, just the same way as a normal residence or a home would be rather dirty if it has not been cleaned out for 21 years, as well.

I am quite convinced that once a recession occurs, Australia real estate could drop more than 20% from peak to trough. The level of mortgage debt Australians hold is now much larger than in 2006 when the US housing market turned south. And let me tell you that soon enough, our unemployment rate will also start to rise. So the question is, will this debt be serviceable? Since I believe we are in for a mean reverting outcome, just like US profit margins, it is only a matter of time until the "the lucky country" takes a turn for the worse. Finally, I found this quite amusing and something that usually gets published at the top of economic growth:
Source: Amazon Books
"There's no better place to be during economic turbulence than Australia. Brilliant in a bust, we've learnt to use our brains in a boom. Despite a lingering inability to acknowledge our achievements at home, the rest of the world asks: how did we get it right?"

60 comments:

  1. Dear Tiho,

    in the previous two month,equity funds had outflows of about 40 billion. Is this a bullish or a bearish sign?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tiho: fine letter you posted here. So Cal was gone through real estate hell off the top and it has impacted the rest of the economy badly. It is hard to see how it will not be the same story with Australia, too, as the excess gets removed and unfortunately hurts people in the process.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How can we position ourselves for the Australian housing bust? Because the largest banks have already acknowledged the risk, and sold most of their exposure to 3th party insurers...

    Tim

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think Austrialia bull housing market ends up with the end of secular commodity bull market.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thx for the post/ update Tiho!

    ReplyDelete
  6. if you want to play the Aussie housing bust short the AUD$. Australia runs a deficit which means the banking system is dependent on wholesale capital and that is *hot* money. Capital will leave Australia putting downward pressure on the AUDUSD and the banks.

    ReplyDelete
  7. America also ran a huge deficit, and the dollar became a lot stronger during the housing bust.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If your going to short anything in Australia it should be mining companies

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for all the nice comments!

    Anonymous #1 - Interesting question. The truth is money keeps going out of mutual funds weather the stock market goes up or down. More money come sour when the stocks decline, but the personally believe that the mutual fund indicator has lost its value of prediction. While a lot of money has left stock mutual funds, a lot of that money has found its way into stock ETFs, which are also funds. The finance industry has changed and mutual funds have become outdated. Also, while a lot of money has left stock mutual funds, it has also found its way into bond funds. But not the one you are thinking off... as in Treasuries... but into Corporate and Junk Bond funds. And these assets move like stocks and corrupted almost perfectly to the stock market. So it is like taking money out of one pocket and putting it into another pocket. In my opinion, this indicator is not that important.

    Anonymous #3 - If making money in the market was easy, we'd all be doing it. *smile*

    Anonymous Last - I wouldn't short Australian Mining companies just that blindly. The fact is majority of them are down between 50% to 70% from their peak in 2011 already. I do not think they have bottomed, but shorting something that has already fallen out creates more risk of a short squeeze or a bear market rally etc etc. Also, I don't like shorting something unless it is going straight up and becomes amazingly expensive.

    As an example, in my mind, Apple is an amazing short, while BHP has fallen a lot already and might not be that much of a good short anymore. Australian stock market has fallen dramatically since 2007, just like the European stock markets (apart from the overvalued DAX 30) and has not recovered like the S&P 500 or DAX. However, Aussie Dollar correlates highly with risk of S&P 500 and in my opinion both are overvalued. If you are going to short anything linked to Australia, short the Aussie Dollar.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I remain bullish on Coffee, Sugar and also Cotton too. I have not purchased anything yet, but plan to eventually. I am not smart enough to know when we are going to bottom, so I thought I ask.

    I have a question for the few short term traders who comment regularly here: I've heard some of you are buying Coffee because it is "breaking out". Those traders who have been bullish, are you still bullish on Coffee and are you still in your trades? Please comment your views / opinions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fairly neutral on coffee right now. But as I've said before, I just pick away at commodity ETFs (JO, NIB, JJC, etc) on pullbacks for the very long term and don't trade any of the softs.

      That said, monthly /KC doesn't look ready and I don't see any "breakout." I know I've seen other people post here and get all excited about short covering pops, but never thought they'd amount to anything but that. Bottoming is a process just as much as topping. When all hope is lost and there are no more sellers, it will run up and away once again like any other market.

      Delete
  11. Hi Tiho,

    It's the first time I post in this blog but I have been following your work over the last 4-5 months.

    First of all, let me congratulate you for the very good research and analysis you are doing. Thanks for sharing your work, I always find very useful to read it, you make very good points.

    Secondly, I would like to let you know that yesterday I went to another blog I used to visit long time ago. There were around 20 traders there and I made my point about the so called bear market, a possible roll over, really bad macroeconomic situation all over the world, etc. All of those traders were from USA or Canada. They thought I was crazy, they were really hostile with me and even more when they saw I was from Spain. It's worth mentioning that I asked if anyone else was shorting the market...no one was shorting the market. If there was some bear on that room I believe he was affraid to say so seeing how they were behaving with me.

    I have been following the markets since late 2007 and investing since 2010. I have never seen so much hostility and so few bears anywhere. You can feel the pressure anywhere. I don't think this is healthy, there is no chance to make a reasonable debate anywhere.

    I wonder how long is this going to be. I have been trying to short this market for over a year but there is not a chance. However it's the first time I see such a extreme, so I think we can't be far away from a market roll over. I have never seen such a disconnection between the markets and the real economy.

    One question: Obama has been really good to the markets, he gave them many financial aids and never confronted them. However Merkel has not been that good for the markets, she confronted with them and did not want to bailout everyone. The ECB most decisive actions were took by Mario Draghi, not her. And I certainly believe she opposed strongly against those LTRO. Do you believe there is a chance that maybe its because of that why markets are behaving quite good this year and they might not behave like this over the next year? Do you think that theory is possible? That possibility is something that has been comming to my mind lately.

    I will continue to follow your blog. Keep it up, your work is really good.


    Regards from Spain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I must note that what I meant about Obama and Merkel is obviously because of the american elections this year (positive trend since Obama did help the markets) and german elections next year (maybe not so good trend since Merkel did not help the markets?)

      If you were the so called "hidden financial powers", what would you do? Merkel while making all those budget cuts all over Europe is sinking the demand of products making european companies to sink hopelessly (therefore affecting globally, specially to all those who export to the EU). If I were them I would try to put someone else in charge. Someone who can do what I need in order to have my companies profiting again and therefore the markets.

      Maybe I am thinking too much, it's just an idea that has been comming to my mind lately.

      I guess you could understand my point in the previous entry but I wanted to clarify it just in case.

      Delete
  12. The first three months of the Obama's term there was a sharp, nasty decline in the stock market.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "America also ran a huge deficit, and the dollar became a lot stronger during the housing bust."

    The US has the benefit that it has the world's reserve currency. Australia does not have that benefit. Moreover, the AUD$ is a yield suck, which means speculative money has parked itself in Australian dollar denominated fixed income assets to get the yield in a environment where EUR, USD, and JPY fixed income assets pay next to nothing.

    Current account deficits = banking system on average is dependent on wholesale funding. In a banking crisis (triggered by a recession or a mining bust) the risks of capital flight mount dramatically as wholesale funds leave. Australia is not the US so don't be on the AUD strengthening in any recession. If there is a housing bust in Australia you can bet that the AUD will get smoked.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dear Tiho,
    Since I get so much value out of your blog,I am happy to share my views on softs.

    Sugar:I bought a small position(i.e. 10/12% of NAV)around 21.15$,as I considered the action to be very bullish:perfect double bottom,with even a quick retest after a couple of weeks,and then an abrupt surge higher on decent volumes,with price convincingly breaking through some major moving averages(i.e. 50/100 days SMA).I also consider recent action to be very bullish,as price spent a few days consolidating above the 70 days SMA,with decent buying pressure coming in every time a decline seemed to be likely.So,if I were not already positioned,I'd buy right at the open on Monday or I would wait to see how price behaves around the 200 days SMA/declining trendline(if it gets there),since that's where the last rally got stopped in its tracks.In any case I'd be extra careful,since sugar is known to be a little trending bastard and it generally doesn't give you too much time to think about what to do:either you get in fairly early or you're left pondering whether to chase.

    Coffe:I am quite bullish,but I have not yet opened a position,since I simply fail to see any clear and interesting set-ups.I might consider getting long if price were to spend a few days/weeks consolidating in the current zone before authoritatively breaking through the 200 days SMA,but honestly right now my bias is to the downside and I would look favourably at a decline towards 150$(with maybe a little break below to scare the technical crowd),at which point my desire to get long would likely increase substantially.In any case I would only purchase a small position(i.e. no more than 10%),given that I consider the market to be too erratic and volatile for larger commitments.

    Cocoa:I'll leave you with a quote from a trader,as related by Stanley Kroll in his excellent book:"Whenever I feel like trading Cocoa,I lay down in bed until the feeling passes".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I forgot to mention that I am also monitoring Cotton.I am rather bullish overall,but I have yet to see an interesting set-up.I consider the current nothing/nowhere action to be constructive,but I do can't rule out the possibility of a final wash-out and I simply think it's too early to get excited about buying this market.

      Delete
  15. Tiho,
    Funny you mentioned Coffee. I just got stopped out a couple of days ago. I have a feeling it will go down a bit more before it's good to go.
    PM and miners feel very toppy, but I'm well above the stops and will wait to see if one more spike up. The overbought conditions in equities disappeared by now. I see some upside before reversing.
    Jacek

    ReplyDelete
  16. I want to thank everyone for posting very interesting comments. It is currently late here so tomorrow morning (Asian time zone) I will do a quick update of recent observations I hold in the comment section. I will also reply to some very interesting comments! ~ Tiho

    ReplyDelete
  17. Looking fwd to hearing your comments as usual.
    Mitch

    ReplyDelete
  18. LMAO, how do these people ever get into the newsletter business? Oh yeah, because they need income because their trading doesn't work. As you have gathered already: Never trust a technician that "anticipates" a breakout, that is the antithesis of trading. A successful pure technician (of the pattern trading variety) NEVER front-runs a breakout (technically the pattern does not even exist until confirmed, it is only a potential that can morph into something else), the market must "prove" itself BEFORE a trade is made.

    If you are looking to find people to help with your timing, someone who trades breakouts is probably not best, since you are a fundamental investor, you are trying to buy low, sell high, the nature of breakouts means price has already advanced (or declined for shorts) by the time the position is ready as this type of trader is trying to buy high, sell higher, price and value (should) mean nothing to them. You should focus on those who identify levels of support to buy at, or oversold conditions in an uptrend to buy the dips to fit with a buying low strategy. Also, keep it simple, since you already put fundamentals on your side, there is no need for complex systems (which are generally over-designed and don't work well anyway).

    Hope that provides a bit of insight in case different types and methods of traders didn't dawn on you previously. Note that traders that use methods that fit well with fundamentals won't be too abundant because most traders want to follow the smart money, i.e. buy after a turn has already occurred, while you are trying to be the smart money: anticipating the turn and buying before. Elliott Wave is really the only system that can anticipate turns with any degree of accuracy and consistency, but because of its complexity and very different nature from traditional technicals, you pretty much need to know at least the basics of the theory yourself to judge whether the analyst has a clue (plenty of self appointed "experts" don't even follow the most basic rules outlined in Nature's Law and Elliott Wave Principle), so unless you want to spend that degree of time, just focus on identifying basic support/resistance levels and traditional chart patterns (candlestick patterns would probably also be good for you to identify when a turn may just have occurred so you can buy as a downtrend may be ending) and finding experienced others who do so as well.

    Well, that post got longer than I expected, hope it points you in the right direction of what to look for in your studies.

    ReplyDelete
  19. My observation on Gold:

    Over the last week or two, I've received technical newsletters from Nomura, Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank and USB investment research departments, all of whom are claiming that prices should / could / will move to $1,900 for Gold, as we break above $1,800. I've had numerous friends email me in regards to buying Gold and Silver right now, and these boys majority of the time hold no interest in markets. Furthermore, many blogs and newsletter services that I read, also write about the same price targets in the near term.

    Sentiment indicators like COT positioning shows that Small Speculators, also known as Dumb Money, hold record bullish exposure towards Gold. There is also incredibly high speculation in Platinum, as hedge funds hold bullish exposure that is two times larger than the previous record. Furthermore, GLD has witnessed record influx of hot money over the last month or two, as the retail crowd jumps over each other to gain PMs exposure.

    It seems that everyone is eager and willing to rush into the PMs sector. From my experience in this business, it is never wise to follow consensus or do as majority does, regardless of what indicator, tool or setup gives you a green light. Having said all that, I own PMs as my largest holding in the fund for a long time now and I am still very bullish long term. I am also not selling my PMs today nor am I reducing my exposure. More importantly, would I buy today or tomorrow? My view is that I would not be buying right here. I rather buy when others are selling and I rather wait for Gold to drop another $50 to $100. Since almost everyone I follow seems to think Gold will go to $1,900, I'd rather think it will go to $1,700 first.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I generally agree with you, and I actually thought at the beginning of September that gold/PM were overheating (I was wrong and lost quite a big coin of missed opportunity in my leveraged position). However, I see signs now that the speculation went down after Sept 15th a lot and thus, I'm expecting one more trust up before a sharp correction.
      Jacek

      Delete
  20. My observation on Stocks:

    In general, since March 2009 bull start, market particpants have been trained like Pavlov's dogs towards central bank stimulus. When Bernanke blows the whistle, majority rush into risk assets and out of safe havens. However, as we all already know, something strange occurred this time around. Bernanke blew the whistle at S&P 500 4 year market highs. My personal opinion, which obviously could be wrong, leans towards market participants being trained so well, that they have now front-run the Fed and largely discounted QE3 @ $40 billion per month out of June lows.

    Cyclical sectors relative to Defensives continue to struggle since last years peak. As I have been warning for several weeks already, despite new market highs breadth is not expanding nor confirming the breakout above 1420. Finally, the market is now extremely overbought for only the eight time in the last 6 years according to the High Low Ratio. Out of the last eight occurrences when 90% or more stocks were making new 52 week highs relative to lows (over smoothed 21 day average), the following happened:

    - in Nov 06 stocks rallied few percent more before giving it all back
    - in Feb 07 stocks corrected almost immediately with a sharp drop
    - in Mar 07 stocks rallied few percent more, than bull market topped
    - in Oct 09 stocks corrected almost immediately with a sharp drop
    - in Jan 10 stock corrected almost immediately with a sharp drop
    - in Mar 10 stocks rallied few percent more before giving it all back
    - in Feb 11 stocks corrected almost immediately with a sharp drop
    - in Mar 12 stocks rallied few percent more before giving it all back

    Therefore, it is my opinion that whoever buys right here, or has already bought over the last several weeks, will most likely find their long stock exposure underwater sometime after the US election is over and done with. Either stocks will "rally a few percent more before giving it all back" or stocks will "correct almost immediately with a sharp drop" in the near future. Furthermore, I believe that almost all risk assets like equities, junk bonds, industrial commodities and commodity currencies, will sell off and become much cheaper in the next 6 months or so from the current price levels.

    ReplyDelete
  21. My observation on Bonds:

    When it comes to Bonds, while I also believe Treasuries are in a major bubble and are extremely overvalued from a long term perspective, not if but when economic data deteriorates even more, this asset class might rally somewhat higher as a Safe Haven. I think it has become quite clear that the inflation trade has become the darling theme of the investment world. Everywhere, everyone is throwing around reasons like "reflation", "unlimited bond buying", "central banks to the rescue". "be worried about inflation", "QE infinity", "CB rate cuts", "ECB saved the day", etc etc etc etc.

    US Treasury 10 Year Break Even rate is now overcooked once again, as it has reached extreme upside levels. Since the Global Finance Crisis started in 2008, whenever TIPS became extremely overvalued relative to equal maturity Treasuries (inflation became consensus trade like today), it was always much wiser to buy Treasuries and sell risk assets. Out of the last four occurrences when 10 Year Break Even rate reached 2.5% or more, the following happened:

    - in Jan 10 Treasuries bottomed, Stocks corrected, VIX jumped
    - in Apr 07 Treasuries rallied, Stocks flash crashed, VIX spiked
    - in Feb 11 Treasuries bottomed, Stocks corrected, VIX jumped
    - in Mar 12 Treasuries bottomed, Stocks corrected, VIX jumped

    Currently, the conditions seem even more complacent with the VIX 4 week moving average sitting at very complacent levels. At the same time, equity cash levels are at extremely low, while inflows into Junk Bonds are at record (mums and pops chasing yield) and hedge fund positioning in commodity currencies is ridiculously high (hedge funds chasing carry trade). I'd argue that Bonds and Japanese Yen will once again benefit in the next risk off move as Safe Havens, even though they are dramatically overvalued.

    Bulls have been telling us that the VIX can and will remain at extremely low levels for a long time from here. I do not believe this at all. As a matter of fact, it is only a matter of time until volatility starts rising yet again. The Skew Index has now started to rise meaningfully, which means Puts are becoming very expensive relative to Calls. I think smart money is now rushing for protection, while dumb money is rushing for risk. As one smart investment bank analyst stated over the weekend:

    "For whatever it is worth, an elevation in the Skew Index, a measure of the cost difference between puts and calls on the S&P 500 index, has previously occurred or pre-occured with a pickup in volatility."

    Furthermore, the bulls have constantly been telling us that the Citigroup Economic Surprise Index is rising, but has any bull noticed that the yields refuse to follow ES Index higher? What that is telling us is that despite data beating economists expectations, the underlaying trend of global economic data is still well and truly down and not improving substantially.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree top is near, but this is not top yet. Tiho, since you mentioned TIPS, look at the TIP:TLT ratio. Far from topping for an "inflation trade mania."
      Jacek

      Delete
    2. Best to be out early than too late Jacek

      Delete
  22. great update tiho. really enjoyed reading your observations.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Tiho,

    Do these two statements really compute?

    ##
    He believes that Australia real estate prices will move sideways and do not have large downside risks. I hope for the sake of everyone in Australia that he is right.

    AND

    The level of mortgage debt Australians hold is now much larger than in 2006 when the US housing market turned south. And let me tell you that soon enough, our unemployment rate will also start to rise. So the question is, will this debt be serviceable?
    ##

    It's high prices that create huge mortgage debt. Why wish for prices to stay up so that more mortgage debt is created by people who buy now and in the future? Each time a house is sold at a bubble price that was bought pre-bubble it increases the mortgage debt and as banks are a drain on an economy the longer the housing bubble madness goes on the worse the problem becomes. Australia needs a quick deflation of the their housing boom not a slow a economy destroying one brought about by government props like in the UK. The people who overpaid need to suffer so that everyone else in the future don't have to.
    An extra $1trn on the value of the housing stick is what? An extra $60bn in mortgage interest? So $60bn less disposable income. Just hope your government don't start saying they need to print money to prop up assets so people spend more - it's a lie put about by bankers and the tiny percent who own a huge part of the assets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RE: First quote above, it sounds like the Bernank was in Australia recently and gave his blessing to the housing situation.

      Delete
  24. I hope that prices do not go down, not because of economic indicators which you mentioned, but because of many friends and family I have in Australia. I'm Australian myself, so I'd hate to see a big bust occur here with similarities to US and EU, for the sake of my family and friends lifestyle. That is the only reason I commented on "hope" otherwise there is no use for hope in the world of investing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did your friends and family all buy in the bubble or could they stand a reduction in prices as they bought when houses were cheaper? If house prices drop to more sensible earning levels then banks can extract less from the economy. Are they all happy their children will become debt slaves to banks, if house prices don't correct? Look at average earnings 10 years ago to average house prices then compare them with today. Is it really good that labour is being devalued against living costs?

      Your interest rates are on the way down because of your housing bubble like in the UK. You used to say you weren't forced to invest because your interest rates were so high. Welcome to financial repression caused by housing bubbles.

      Delete
  25. IMHO, coffee is at the bottom of a triangle, I'm going long again with a big allocation. Wish me luck I won't be stopped this time.
    PM are holding well considering this dollar spike today. Wall of worry is palpable in the short term perspective.
    Jacek

    ReplyDelete
  26. I've started accumulating Sugar today. If prices behave well in coming weeks, I might buy even more. I'm still holding back on other Softs like Coffee and Cotton, but I remain long term bull on all three. I also remain bullish on Cocoa, but am not buying today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No positions in cotton and it looks ugly from a long term perspective. If 70 gives, it could go to $40 in a hurry. It's been beaten to a pulp (no pun intended) but that doesn't mean it cannot run extremely beaten for a long time.

      Sugar is just playing pinball down it's descending wedge that it's been locked in for two years. The higher highs in the daily are encouraging, but the weekly's need to confirm a buy signal of some sorts for me personally.

      Cocoa price action is great to watch as it tears people apart trying to pick a bottom. Not getting caught up in the grind here, but it looks great on on a long term basis. I'm hoping it kills some more bulls and drops down to the $22.55 level again.

      I really wish I could post charts here!

      Delete
    2. I disagree with your calls, but disagreement is what makes a market between bulls and bears. I am very optimistic about Soft commodities. Regards of what charts say, demand and supply is favourable for this asset class. I plan to buy both in the future. So what do you recommend we buy? US stocks? Apple? Amazon? Health Care stocks? Australian Dollar? Junk Bonds? Treasuries? I don't see value in any of those and hold short positions on almost all of them. Where do you see value?

      Delete
    3. I didn't say I didn't see ANY value in them, I simply pointed out how price action over time will determine my own personal entry points. But since you asked, I'm long physical metal as I have been for years and will short bonds and the Russell 2K when it hits my target. I also trade miners and short squeezes on stocks like GRPN, NFLX, FSLR, FB...all the stocks that everyone else hates.

      But I happen to think that anything one could want to know about any stock or commodity fundamentals wise is reflected in the real time feed you see on the screen. So I don't do all the leg work you do in terms of the macro picture because I've learned that doing so just sets me up for failure because of confirmation bias with the fairytale story I have in my head - the one I WANT to happen to justify my positions. Just me, here...everyone is different.

      Delete
  27. what contracts are you guys trading for sugar, coffee, and cocoa? I use interactive brokers but not sure which contracts you guys are referring to. Appreciate the feedback.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I use IB as well and I am trading Sugar N°11 on the NYBOT(currently March'13 is the most liquid contract),symbol SBH3.
      I am not trading the other softs,but if I were I would be using Coffee "C"(symbol KC+month+year)and Cotton N°2(symbol CT+month+year),both traded on the NYBOT.You can use Barchart.com to check the most liquid contracts.

      Delete
    2. I think ETFs, which use futures that are constantly rolled over, are just as good as using futures if the commodity trades close to spot and doesn't suffer high contango. From what I can see Coffee suffers slightly, but Cotton and Sugar are very good in that regard. Therefore using BAL and SGG is just as good as futures contracts from my point of view. I also tend to sue futures as well as options depending o what I am trying to do.

      Delete
    3. I use JO as coffee ETF. But, pretty volatile stuff and low volume too.

      Delete
    4. I watch /SB, /KC, and /CC and then buy SGG, JO, and NIB based on price action. No, they don't correlate 100% but I'm not about to open a futures trading account just to get a slice of the pie, either.

      Delete
    5. @funky tape. Futures account is leveraged. Completely different beast. You are playing it safe. I think that's smart. However the returns are also an order of magnitude less than futures.

      Delete
    6. No, I know that. My point is that one cannot go from the futures contract charts to the ETF's and expect to see a 1:1 correlation in price action in terms of technical indicators. I guess I have the habit of watching the real thing move and then buy based on that rather than just watching the ETF itself.

      I'd never suggest anyone buy ETF's if they wanted actual exposure to the real deal; I'm sort of forced to buy crappy derivatives in my IRA accounts.

      Delete
  28. The AAPL is falliing from the tree...
    If it can't break $670, then I figure it's heading down to $430 over time to continue the trend from 2009.
    Without a doubt.

    Disclosure: I have zero position in AAPL
    Mitch

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mini ipads out in a few weeks - 10 million of them, enough to ramp AAPL up again to near $700?

      Delete
    2. I've been saying the same thing for the past year and half. One day at a time. First, let it get back to the 100MA which has been support since Dec of last year. We're almost there right now. Then watch the weekly's for sell confirmations or see if the 100 fails and wants to see the 200MA again....which it hasn't seen in almost a year.

      This "Apple is falling because of bad news reports" is pure nonsense. The market is never wrong.

      Then, when everyone has jumped ship, jump back on and ride it up!! Simple! (I kid!)

      Delete
    3. You won't see me buying any "bounces" in Apple. Not with my money. No way in hell. apple is up 110 times since 2003. I have never heard of any asset that offered value after it appreciated 110 times in less than a decade!

      Delete
  29. Traders will trade price swings regardless of trend, but for those investors amongst us, I hope you are smart enough to protect yourselves for all the awful things that will play out post US election and well into 2013/14. One way to protect yourself when bad times comes is to own assets that will appreciate during turmoil. Another way is to learn how to sell short assets that will suffer during turmoil.

    While many many many bulls here and else disagree, I see Chinese real estate will most likely experience a hard landing, Euro Crisis heading for a final climax which could include a well overdue default out of Greece and US will once again enter a recession. Australian, Canadian, Hong Kong and Singapore real estate is in a bubble. The world will have problems going forward.

    I have shorted various risk assets, and one of them is Apple at the end of August as already disclosed here on the day of entry. There are many other things I have done to protect myself, including holding a large Precious Metals exposure. My outlook is for a terrible 2013 and 2014. Protect yourself before its too late!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Tiho,
    Don't take it personally when people don't agree with you 100%. IMHO, you are absolutely correct in your macroeconomic news and general public is just catching up to that. Most disagreements here steam from exact timing. If you are saying crash sometime between winter 2012 and early 2013, most people here will agree.
    jacek

    ReplyDelete
  31. I'm personally waiting for one strong move up before closing my miners and shorting anything.
    jacek

    ReplyDelete
  32. Dr. Tiho Doom has spoken :-),

    Although I tend to agree with Tiho's post above, I do find it strange how the market does not seem to be behind the eight ball. That's why "timing" the markets is impossible. I have been anxious to add to my SH short, but I feel that we might see 1550 or so first on the S&P. We can all speculate - which is exactly what I'm doing.

    I read what marketwatch.com has to say all the time and these guys/women change their views whenever they want. I just don't trust what they're saying.

    Apple just did its famous head and shoulders pattern and I personally see crazy weakness. If AAPL is a leader, then - ouch.

    As for the real estate market in Canada, again, we're all entitled to our opinion. I think that Vancouver and Toronto will experience a drop. I just surfed, and sure enough:

    http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/housing-market/

    Quebec seems to be catching up price wise to the rest of Canada right now. The boom is incredible.
    Keep in mind, this is going on behind the scenes too...

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/10/09/montreal-zambito-charbonneau-inquiry-liberals-normandeau.html

    Eventually, things will come down to earth with prices because I can certainly attest to the fact that MY salary has not increased 6% year over year. Real estate has though in Quebec (and I confirmed with the Canadian Government). If salary cannot sustain the appreciating housing values, who is going to buy - Foreign investors? If the rest of the world is experiencing a housing slowdown, then... something has gotta give!

    Disclosure as usual - I have an extremely small position being long SH = Short S&P 500.
    If I listen to Dr. Tiho Doom, I might have to look into going long SRS.

    Thanks for reading :-)
    Mitch


    ReplyDelete
  33. Silver is giving every indication that it is about to jump off a cliff. Lots of denial out there from small/retail silver investors.

    I fear the big boys are about to take them for the last 2 month's profits and leave them holding silver bought at 35ish when they force it down to 30 or even lower.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Down is supposed to be faster than up..............different this time? Lots of stocks on margin and long S and P futures contracts in the US for the market to grind up.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Groucho Marx bought on margin because stocks were a sure-fire hit - it almost lost him every penny he had when the market that could not crash did indeed crash in 1929.

    ReplyDelete
  36. There has been a lot of comments made about timing. I will comment on this with my own view:

    No one can time every single trade and investment perfectly and furthermore markets are volatile so no one should be expected to. But when it comes to trading, people are obsessed with getting into a trade and making a profit straight away. As soon as the trade goes against you even a little bit, people freak out and cannot weather a drawdown at all. Stop losses are triggered automatically and one would say that the trade was "wrong". I never understood that concept and I still don't understand it today. To me it is totally stupid. The market robs you off your capital and apparently you were "wrong", only to see your views and convictions play out a few weeks or months later.

    How many times have all of us heard people say... "ohh I shorted the S&P 500 in February or March 2007, which was only a few months before the top, but got stopped out and cleaned out. Man I would have made so much money but my timing was wrong."

    I don't understand that at all. I mean, how was that timing wrong? You picked a top almost perfectly, off by only a few months in a bull market that run up from March 2003 until June 2007. So you were off by a few percent... so what? I'd say just hold with a conviction, but people never do! Why? Because they use high leverage with tight stop losses.... that is why.

    Instead of worrying about large amount of profit you could make because you have leveraged yourself with tight stop losses, just enter investment themes or trades with smaller capital and no leverage without any stop losses. That is what I do. So if a stock market rallies 3% or 5% or 8% against me or even god forbid 15% against me, I still do not panic. I just hold and wait for my thesis to play out.

    Now, understand that I hardly ever short assets. For those that follow my blog, I was also quite bullish in September and October 2011, while majority called for a recession and a bear market. I have not shorted anything since 2008, so for me to go short, I would need a very strong reason to do so. Therefore, I only engage into shorting activity when I think the bull market is finished. So how does one know the bull market is finished? Well, it comes from studying fundamentals and underlying conditions, not technical squiggly lines.

    Now, no body really wants to study underlaying conditions. They think it is a waste of time. But that is because it is not easy to study fundamentals - it is just too hard and takes too much time. People want quick bucks from quick decisions, so instead they just relaying on charts and technicals. But it is very easy to relay on the chart, follow various moving averages and make quotes like "everything is in the price, so I don't bother with fundamentals" or "you might be right long term, but moving averages say that the trend is my friend, so the wall of worry is up".

    These sayings come from inexperienced investors, all of whom always use same or similar lines. You know someone has not made a lot of money in the market, when you hear them say something like that. If it was as easy as saying "trend is your friend" or "technical price already shows fundamentals", than Warren Buffett would be a total fool (and most likely broke) and your regular technical analyst during lunch time on CNBC would be on the Forbes Rich List.

    Finally, if I am convinced that the bear market is up on us, I will not cover shorts until it plays out and fundamentals start to improve. Keep in mind that conviction should have nothing to do with price. This is where majority of the inexperienced ones amongst us fail. They let daily or weekly price swings, swing their emotions and convictions. Just because S&P rallies or fell 5% or 10% from ones entry, does that mean you are wrong? Don't let short term price movements distract you from the big picture and change your opinion due to emotional swings.

    ReplyDelete
  37. And remember the wise words from Jesse Livermore:

    "The big money was not in the individual fluctuations but in the main movements that is, not in reading the tape but in sizing up the entire market and its trend. I can’t tell you how it came to take me so many years to learn that instead of placing piking bets on what the next few quotations were going to be, my game was to anticipate what was going to happen in a big way.

    A man must study general conditions, to seize them so as to be able to anticipate probabilities. I have learned to study general conditions, to take a position and stick to it. You will be right, not because of a hunch or from skilful reading of the daily movements in tape, but as the result of your analysis of fundamental conditions affecting the stock market in general. One shouldn't be guessing, one should be anticipating the inevitable.

    A man may see straight and clearly and yet become impatient or doubtful when the market takes its time about doing as he figured it must do. That is why so many men in Wall Street, who are not at all in the sucker class, not even in the third grade, nevertheless lose money. The market does not beat them. They beat themselves, because though they have brains they cannot sit tight. You need not only the courage of your convictions but the intelligent patience to sit tight.

    It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting. Got that? My sitting tight! It is no trick at all to be right on the market. You always find lots of early bulls in bull markets and early bears in bear markets. I’ve known many men who were right at exactly the right time, and began buying or selling stocks when prices were at the very level which should show the greatest profit. And their experience invariably matched mine that is, they made no real money out of it. Men who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon. I found it one of the hardest things to learn. But it is only after a stock operator has firmly grasped this that he can make big money. It is literally true that millions come easier to a trader after he knows how to trade than hundreds did in the days of his ignorance."

    ReplyDelete