Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Should We Expect More QE?

Market Notes
  • In a sign of speculative activity, retail investors are chasing higher beta stocks on the Nasdaq exchange. Total volume on the Nasdaq has been triple that of the NYSE lately. Previous similarities occurred in May 2011, November 2011 and February 2012. The first two signalled an intermediate top, while the rally continued for another month in the last occurrence.
  • Volatility Index (VIX) has closed below 14 yesterday. This is the second lowest price period since the Global Financial Crisis started in late 2007. Previous closes below 15 since the GFC occurred in middle of April 2011 and in early March 2012. S&P peaked two weeks after and lost 16% & 10% respectively into the intermediate lows of August 2011 and June 2012.
  • European stocks have now gained for 10 weeks straight. I am very uncomfortable with that type of a streak for any asset class, let alone one like European stocks where the fundamental situation seems to be worsening. Gains are attributed to oversold stock prices, negative sentiment and most importantly "hope" that central bankers including ECB's Mr Draghi will deliver more stimulus.
Big Picture
Short term, we can see that Copper and Gold has failed to rally with other risk assets like Equities, Currencies and Crude Oil over last several weeks. Furthermore, the short term rise in the DAX 30, Commodity Currencies and Brent Crude (not shown here) has been almost vertical. So far no major commodity has regained the 200 day MA.

Leading Indicators
Global economic data continues to beat economist's expectations. This is a positive for the time being and it has been helping global stocks and other risk assets move higher in the last couple of weeks.
Despite data improvements relative to economists expectations and despite the rise in the stock market, ECRI WLI refuses to move higher and remains in a downtrend of lower highs. It seems that each rise in the stock market, produced by central bank stimulus, has created smaller and smaller boosts to real  economic activity.
New OECD Leading Economic Indicator data shows Eurozone and China remain in a serious slowdown with economic contraction, while the US is now slowing and fading from positive growth. Japan is following the US into a slowdown too, while other BRIC countries are also losing momentum, with Russia recently entering negative growth on the LEI as well. In summary, OECD Total LEI's uptick in growth from the 2011 slowdown, is now rapidly fading.

Featured Article
Majority of market participants are discussing weather or not central banks are about to engage into re-inflating policies, which the world has witnessed several times since the 2008 recession and which Pavlov's dogs have become accustom to at any sign of economic slowdown. While it is my opinion that various QE's from global central banks will occur eventually, the current "hopes" for further stimulus are not justified. Various data points, which Ben Bernanke himself follows closely, reveal that the time for additional easing is still NOT upon us.

You must be reading the beginning of this article and pretty much thinking that I am full of "you know what", since you have heard the rumours that Federal Reserve will most likely start a QE3 come Jackson's Hole. After all Mr Bernanke and other FOMC members have made promises over the last several months for further easing. Well, regardless of weather I am wrong or right, I personally think there is close to a 0% chance of QE3 right now. Let me explain:
The chart above shows US Treasury 5 Year Break Even Rate, also known as market's forward inflation expectations over a 5 year maturity. The Fed closely follows these readings and prefers / tries to keep the expected inflation range between its mandate target of 2% on the downside and 3% on the upside. At various times, if the inflation expectations move out of the preferred target band, the Fed tends to intervene. It tightens monetary policy if inflation expectations exceeds 3% (by letting various monetary programs conclude); and it eases monetary policy if inflation expectations falls below 2% (starts monetary programs as it worries about deflation shocks). In the chart above, we can see various interventions by the FOMC have been guided by the above indicator.

Assuming I am right and inflation expectations are way to high for the Fed to stimulate right now, the question is what would happen to major assets globally? Good question, let us compare the 5 Year Break Evens against S&P 500:
As we can see, the correlation between these two indicators is extremely positive. Historically, every Fed stimulus program came about due to a deflation shock, where the market's expectations of future inflation rate dropped below the Fed's target range. Historically the story runs like this:

  • The market crashed into October 2008, the VIX capitulated above 80 and every single man and his dog were fearful that the world was well and truly ending. FOMC started the QE 1 during that infamous deflation shock of 2008. Equities started their bottoming process, however, it became obvious that inflation expectations still remained well below 2% target range. The Fed up'ed the ante on QE and the market bottomed almost instantly. A super rally followed.
  • Recovery lasted well into spring of 2010, when the "inflation trade" became consensus. Majority of market participants started talking about how Federal Reserve was going to start its hiking cycle and the 5 Yr Break Even hit the upper range of Fed's target. What followed was a market flash crash that was blamed on a trader's fat finger mistake ("highly likely story"), falling Core inflation figures and slowing economic activity. 
  • 5 Yr Break Evens found themselves edging onto the Fed's 2% target during summer months, which is the lower bound of the range. It was time to act. At the Jackson's Hole meeting in late August 2010, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben "Helicopter" Bernanke announced that he was going to begin another round of QE. The market bottomed almost instantly and another super rally followed well into the early parts of 2011.
  • The inflation outlook was running well and truly wild at this point. Emerging markets were overheating and commodities were going through the roof. It was once again time for the Federal Reserve to end all of its programs and think about how to start tightening monetary policy. Break Evens were again around the 3% upper bound range and the S&P 500 as well as majority of all other risk assets started peaking (majority of which are still below this high).
  • All of a sudden in late July, US budget problems started to appear on front page as we watched politicians play a game of chicken, refusing to raise the debt ceiling. Eventually in early August, S&P downgraded the US and risk assets crashed. The sell off was blamed on the US losing its AAA rating, but we all know that Bonds rallied and Stocks / Commodities fell because QE2 finished, which meant the Federal Reserve was tightening their expansive policy and closing the stimulus taps.
  • Only a couple of months pasted and the Break Even rate found itself on the lower range of the Fed's 2% target. The deflation trade became consensus again, just like during the summer months of 2010. Recession talk was spreading like wildfire. It was time to act. Out of nowhere, FOMC held a "panic" meeting and the Federal Reserve Chairman Ben "Helicopter" Bernanke announced that he was going to stimulate again, starting a program called Operation Twist. The market bottomed almost instantly and another strong rally followed.
So here we are today with 5 Year Break Even rate around 2.7%, well away from Fed's lower bound of 2%, and yet Pavlov's dogs are fuelling the current risk rally on a "hope" that further money printing is just around the corner. The reason I say "hope" is because it takes a blind man not to recognise that economic activity is slowing rapidly, the business cycle is contracting and the global economy is approaching a recession. At the same time, S&P 500 is less than 1% below its bull market high.

Unless Bernanke is willing to risk the Federal Reserve's reputation and go against his mandate, one could easily assume that "hopes" of further stimulus coming out of the FOMC meetings or Jackson's Hole are just that... hopes. For the Fed to restart its "money printing" programs, we would need to see Break Evens fall towards 2%. In other words we would need to see another deflation shock within the financial markets and if correlations are anything to go by, that would mean a strong sell off in the S&P 500 and Crude Oil, a serious spike in the VIX and a rally in the US Dollar and Treasury Bonds. It is only then that we could see Federal Reserve and "Helicopter Ben" act again...

Trading Diary
  • Positioning: Long focus is towards secular commodity bull market, with Precious Metals and Agriculture offering the best value. Substantial position is held especially in Silver, because I believe central banks will eventually print money again, as the global economic activity deteriorates. Precious Metals longs are hedged because Silver could break down below $26 support, but on upside break hedges will be taken off. Short focus is towards secular equity bear market, with cyclical sectors and credit offering best selling opportunities. Mild to modest exposure is held short in the Junk Bond market, as well as various US stock sectors like Technology, Discretionary and Dow Transportation.
  • Watch-list: Commodity currencies like Aussie, Kiwi and Loonie are also on my watch list of potential shorts right now, as negative surprises await with China slowing dangerously. With Euro being the most hated currency, a better risk off trade could be selling the British Pound right now. A major short in due time will be US Treasury long bonds, as they are extremely overbought and in a mist of a huge bubble mania, but first we have to wait for the Eurozone dust to settle.
What I Am Watching

47 comments:

  1. Pavlov's dogs are always barking for more QE!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another excellent commentary. Really good stuff.

    I don't trust ben to heed the warning of the five year breakeven chart as much as you do, though. I think when push comes to shove and all that, they'll print.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anonymous,

      Yes of course, a lot of investors say that. I hear it all the time as a matter of fact. It is a common remark from less informed investors toward monetary policy. Please do not misunderstand me as I am not saying that I am more informed and I am not trying to say that in a bad way, but the fact of the matter is majority of investors do not know what Federal Reserve members focus on and the way they react to economic developments.

      The reason for this is because they are totally disinterested and we have never had this much addiction to monetary stimulus and market intervention by central banks in decades. It is like a new phenomena of a sort, and investors have become completely addicted to it and constantly crave for it to push asset prices higher, despite awful fundamental backdrop.

      Therefore, I am not sure if I understand you right but you sort of imply that if "push comes to shove" Ben will just print anyway regardless of inflation readings, coz that is what he does, that is what he has done before and since he is sort of like a clown figure within the investment world, he will just entertain us all with another round of QE.

      Majority think they will print for the sake of printing if some economic indicator says this or does that. Not true. Not true even remotely, in my opinion. They will only act if it is within their mandate to do so, because they are governed by rules which they have to obey and follow. Believe it or not, they focus on the Break Even rate a lot more than majority think or know, as their mandate states to control inflation and create price stability. They do not want deflation, nor do they want inflation. They try to stick within their target range as best as they can.

      As a matter of fact, Mr Ben Bernanke follows this indicator so closely, that the Federal Reserve has its own 5 Year Break Even rate measure. Officially named "Fed's Five-year Forward Breakeven Inflation Rate" under the code FED5YEAR:IND on Bloomberg terminal. Yes that is right... the Fed has its own readings of future inflation break even rate.

      It is one of the most important tools they track. Don't underestimate the importance of this tool for the Federal Reserve member decisions and voting, because regardless of what you and I think, our opinions do not count and we are not on the FOMC voting board. Those who are on the FOMC pay very very close attention to inflation expectations (Break Evens), because they believe it the best gauge of future inflation which they tend to control as a part of their mandate... and their mandate is their job.

      Delete
    2. Actually, they have a dual mandate. Not a single mandate.
      And I think that people who believe the fed is not political are the ones who are illinformed.
      The entire history of the fed is one of them being bullied to comply with various administrations.

      Delete
    3. Yes you are right. Obviously, I think majority should already know the Fed has a dual mandate of inflation and employment, unlike say the ECB or the BoE or the RBA her win Australia. For the sake of this article, I have only been discussing the inflation side. A case can also be made that employment figures aren't seriously deteriorating (job gains are still present) for the Fed to act immediately on one of its mandates and disregard the other.

      Delete
  3. Well at least you don't write things that everybody on CNBC tals about, like buying into high yielding stocks. The thought process is always abstract and refreshingly different on this page.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love high yielding stocks and recommend you should back the truck up and buy buy buy buy... haha joking!

      Delete
    2. SJB is a non leveraged short ETF for high yield. Should be good for the next couple months.

      Delete
  4. All the point you have made are valid...as the world is positioned for Armageddon as reflected by the sovereign treasury rates. What would surprise the bearish traders and catch them unprepared?

    May be ...example du jour...Yahoo finance " The data showed retail sales rose 0.8 percent in July, the first rise in four months and biggest since February. Economists polled by Reuters had expected retail a 0.3 percent increase.".

    Well. No recession yet. Right or wrong, the market is climbing the wall of worries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Being contrarian works very well and always will. You are right in saying that huge amounts of capital are sitting in bonds. But being contrarian works very well when you are right about the outcome and majority aren't as M Stienhart always use to famously say. In other words, being contrarian is not enough on its own.

      So I ask you, what will actually occur so that bond traders are caught unprepared? A new boom? High jump in growth rates? A miracle in Europe? Debt forgiveness plan between G20? What can actually happen to catch bond traders of guard?

      I wold never buy bonds as I think they are in a massive bubble. Having said that, bubbles go much further than any one of us ever think. Nasdaq doubled in the last few months into March 2000, right after it previously doubled before that and everyone called it a massive bubble.

      Delete
    2. IMHO. No need to be too analytical on this one...given the low rate, there will be an Ops! moment for the bond bulls for whatever reason.

      This is a long campaign and I have scored a nice victory already (not cocky) I will sit tight on TBF.

      Delete
  5. You may be right about their "mandate," but that doesn't explain how the Boston Federal Reserve President, Eric Rosengren, is openly pleading for more easing right now. Although he is currently not a voting member of the FOMC (thank God), he will be by next year which is scary. It's impossible to know what each of the current 12 members are thinking, but to say they will and must follow a certain mandate is a little naive (no offense).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes I agree. There is always a nut here and there. Robert Mugabe also comes to mind. I agree that Break Even rates aren't the only tool, but I just think they are very important for all voting FOMC members, but Fed governors like Mr Evans does not care if inflation exceeds Feds target range. In other words, he wants to inflate it away,,, which is another form of default.

      Delete
    2. So I guess you consider Bernanke sane? :) BTW, very nice blog you have here.

      Delete
    3. Well, you'll notice that I am long commodities like Agriculture and Precious Metals, especially a high holding of Slver. That pretty much states that I have no confidence in any Central bankers, all of whom are being forced into what Mr Charles Evans has already stated above... inflating debt away through currency devaluation. Also thank you a lot for your nice comments. :-)

      Delete
  6. Here's my wild prediction:

    -we get no QE between now and November
    -Obama wins reelection
    -US market sells off heavily due to Obama win and no resolution off the fiscal cliff
    -We get QE and/or policy response Q1 of next year, but only after a 15-25% sell off of the S&P

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Tiho, what is your opinion today on the Swiss Franc. There was a time you were bullish on it...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I still remain bullish on the Swiss Franc, but unfortunately it is still pegged to the Euro. And since I think Euro is going lower, Swiss Franc could follow. Reason I say could, is because I believe the peg will come under stress soonn enough... I would buy the Franc when the USD has its final top and that will be during the up and coming Eurozone crisis inflection point. We are getting closer to a major part playing out.

      Delete
  8. More sector rotation out of the commodity complex today...and treasury sinking.

    Hmmm. I am beginning to think that Wall Street is gearing up for no QE but "an improving economy" as the anchor for the rally into the election.

    Adding large cap growth stocks?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Why would the US markets sell off if Obama gets re-elected? He has been amazingly wonderful for stock markets during his presidency. If anything, the stock markets in the US should soar if he stays in the White House and traders get down on their knees and kiss his bottom.

    Right, back to the task in hand.

    Sometimes in life the best thing to do is to do nothing at all. Stand back, stop angsting over whether to buy stocks or bonds or gold or silver or java beans.

    Watch, wait and the inevitable will manifest itself before your very eyes. Let the markets come to you. Can you hear that? They're coming.

    Doing nothing is actually doing something.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Interesting observation in SLW.

    I'm still in the GDX trade from early yesterday. I wish I were in the green, but I have stops to protect me. Gold recovered and got above its daily cycle trend line before the close.

    http://wp.me/p2CT0a-36

    ReplyDelete
  11. Here is my take - for what it is worth. I have been an avid Fed watcher for 15 years and the Bernanke Fed is a consensus entity with a fairly open operating method. They've been laying out the conditions/hints for more stimulus since the January meeting. I think they've wanted to do more due to the fear of the complete collapse in monetary velocity, combined with confusion due to the seasonals messing with the data and the imbedded paranoia about a 1930's/Japan outcome. The path to act has been via communication strategy followed by media leaks and finally some speeches supporting the upcoming action.

    I've expected those who expect "QE3" to be wrong - not because they will not act, but because the Fed will deploy a far more aggressive long term policy: nominal GDP targeting. The zero bound transitioned market. Expectations away from thr level of rates and towards the size of the balance sheet. Nomonal GDP targeting is the next step in the monetary madness playbook, as the question will no longer be "if" they grow the balance sheet, but "by how much."

    I believe Tiho's view is likely correct if the Fed is operating on a cyclical timeframe. However, I believe they have been laying the groundwork since January via communication towards a secular strategy. The language for rates being low to at least the end of 2014 was the first move. I think there is a fair chance that Benanke or one of his minions makes the academic, and Fed staff research supported, argument for something like nominal GDP targeting. They see monetary velocity tanking and the risks to the global economy via a global recession. They are, as usual, behind the curve in anticipating the US recession, which is already unfolding, but the employment mandate has been an area of focus in their communication strategy in recent months.

    The UK is a good proxy, I think, for where the Fed is going. The BOE has basically talked down inflation issues while continuing to print even as inflation has moved well above their so-called target. The Krugman's of the world think that 4% reported inflation is ok as long as nominal GDP grows at 5%.....as they assume the inflation will increase monetary velocity and econimic activity- i.e. create jobs. In the crazy minds of academics, this is a cost/benefit analysis.

    So I am guessing they use Jackson Hole to lay out the case, but then I am agnostic as to whether they deploy starting in September or immediately following the election. As for the market response, I wonder if so many are so conditioned for QE3 - i.e. a set amount over a set time, that an unspecified open ended policy could confuse/disappoint. The US treasury market seems to be starting to price this in, as is gold possibly. Regardless, I think there is a very good chance that whatever comes out of Jackson Hole, the news is sold. The bear market rally off the June 1 low has been littered with "all news is good news" and I think the high put in today could be the peak for the bear market rally.

    Finally, as for the economy, it has followed a classic feedback loop into recession - the problem is most people are ignorant about the drivers of the business cycle and instead distracted with sociology/politics....otherwise known as economics. Incomes fall, then sales, then new orders, then production, and finally employment. For thos who actually care and look at such things, US data show this sequence and feedback loop unfolding since early this year. Any single BLS # or survey is irrelevent without placing it within this business cycle context. Single data points, which are vunlerable to huge standard errors and heavy subsequent revisions, are basically worthless and provide way too much room for reference dependence and confirmation bias.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank-you for taking the time to share your, obviously deep, knowledge

      Delete
    2. Yes thanks a lot for your views.. very interesting.

      Delete
    3. Unfortunately for the Fed, the US economy is not being constrained by any monetary conditions so there is no policy adjustment that will make a fundamental difference. The QE programs have helped to support financial markets and the markets have become conditioned to them. We seem to be at a point now where sellers are absent for fear of being wrong at a QE announcement of some kind. A wonderful example of game theory writ large.

      The Fed recognizes the impotency of any further easing to affect the real economy. This would include a switch to GDP targets. This lack of impact has made nuanced management through communication ("jawboning") their only choice. I imagine the big fear is that an announcement of new QE will be met with the selling you described and the markets and world will start to recognize that the Fed are unclothed. It will be at that point that difficult problems will start to be addressed. The big example and elephant in the room is: "How do you default through monetization without the bond markets recognizing and pricing in what is happening?" This seems to have been the case so far but a more obvious move towards monetization will take the markets further into uncharted waters. It all starts with the distortions that come with the cost of money being manipulated and mis-priced. I have no idea how it resolves.

      Delete
  12. Great report Tiho as usual. JucoJames, also a great response regarding Uncle Ben's Fed and their machinations...Do you usually post here or do you also post on other blogs?

    ReplyDelete
  13. "A major resolution should be close at hand and interestingly some miners seem to be leading the break on the upside, with Silver Wheaton moving 11% this week alone."

    Perhaps SLW's recent $750m deal should have been mentioned in connection to their 11% rise? It's their first new deal in years.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bond bulls are saying ops again today! Bond price will go where fear and greed will meet. This is not how a finance Armageddon suppose to look like.




    ReplyDelete
  15. This is turning in to one of my favorite blogs. Thanks Tiho.

    I think what you say is well thought out and thought provoking but what bothers me is that it assumes that the Fed is independant and won't be influenced by the government in an election year. If the Republicans win, Bernanke will probably be out of a job and the power of the Fed may be greatly reduced. If there is a further slow down, which I think likely, the only thing they can do to get Obama re-elected is to artificially boost the perception of a good economy via more QE.

    ReplyDelete
  16. jucojames - as always, very good to read your perspective and your comments. Your point regarding UK being a good proxy is definitely right in my opinion. However, I do want to state that it is easier for the UK to "print money" due to two significant reasons, both of which aren't true for the US - the first is that the Pound is not a reserve currency, so devaluing it doesn't rise negative comments from the Russians, the Chinese and the Brazilians etc etc, all of whom hold large Dollar reserves; and the second is that UK economy is in a recession while the US is not, so the case can be made that "more needs to be done" to improve growth while placing inflation aside "for the time being". Obviously, there will come a time in the not so distant future, when Bernanke places inflation aside "for the time being" as he also states that "more needs to be done". That is why I think investors should protect themselves by owning Precious Metals and I remain long this asset class.

    Anonymous - thank you for that update regarding Silver Wheaton. It seems to be acting very good for the time being, while Gold, Silver and Platinum remain is a super tight range. Maybe something will give soon enough, but it seems to me that the markets are just "waiting" for further CB news week after week. For example, Silver has traded between $26 and $29 for about 14 weeks. 14 weeks ago, Silver's 200 day MA was at $33.50 and today its at $30.50 or so. Technically speaking, sometimes new bull market runs occur when price compresses into a tight range, a strong basing bottom gets built, volatility dies out, bears get disinterested and time is allowed for 200 MA to come close enough to price itself - so that it can be broken straight away and therefore resistance becomes support. I am not sure if that will happen now, as we could also break down on further EU worries, but it has all the right ingredients for a bottom.

    Edwin - Here is my observation on bonds: I wrote about technical bearish pattern back in few weeks ago (chart here & here). Fast forward to day and I have noticed the 10 Yr is close to 1.9%, while 30 Yr is reaching close to 3%. Both are now slightly oversold in the short term as they are trading 2 SDs from 50 day MA. Many claim that the Bond market is now sure that Fed will start a QE so it has started to sell off in anticipation of this. Others claim that the economy is now improving once more. There are even people who claim that the Bond market has sniffed inflation and finally a minority claim that the Eurozone problems are finally improving. Many reasons to sell Bonds these days. Yet... I do not see any of those things. Once again, I must be blind. Do not get me wrong - I am not bullish on Bonds... I actually think they are a major bubble and it is ludicrous to lend US government money for 2% over the next 10 years. But, I find it so strange that while Bonds are selling off, equities, commodities and currencies are barley budging (apart from the Yen). If the so called Great Bond Bull Market has broken down, where is the capital flight out of bonds and into other risk asset classes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My target for TLT ($119-$120) is the 200 day SMA & the 50% Fibonacci retracement(from the March low). We will see was happen there.

      The markets have been highly correlated in recent memory but they don't have to all the time.. .perhaps traders see the economy as "less bad" than feared hence the bond sell-off but they are not really ready to buy the equity market amass yet.

      As a trader, I have learned that the most money is made when consensus shifts (in this case. fear dissipating?). my TBF position is smiling and the ratio of SPY:TLT agrees...They are both objective measures and not opinion based....Are we witnessing the early stage of a consensus shift?

      I will continue to monitor and trade the "shift" accordingly.





      Delete
    2. I thought you were holding onto that Bond short "for a very long time", as you stated before?

      Delete
    3. Yes. I will hold bond shorts for a long long long term.. bt may be taking some profit by selling a small portion. I am flexible..I like a victory to booster my confidence and courage. But I am flexible.

      I will engage all my "market enemy" directly and indirectly per the Sun Tzu art of war so I try to fight my enemy in a circle. Just for fun...like the fighting style of Kung Fu which is circular.

      Delete
    4. Hahahaha I very much enjoyed that last line you wrote! :-)

      Delete
  17. Building Permits, and Philly Fed..and market reaction=buy and I just went longer in equity.

    Folks..Please check your opinion at the door . For those people who have got cash, don't stand there and just watch. You must buy uncertainty...otherwise, you may be holding the bag by he time you think it is safe to buy....speaking from my own experience and I am not trying to be cocky.

    Increasing I feel that we may have already seen the low for 2012!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While I do appreciate your "don't stand there and just watch" argument, I don't really understand where the "we may already seen the low for 2012" argument stems from. In my opinion;

      The fundamental picture is one of a failing global economy - Europe in recession, weakening American domestic market and a slowing Asia (understated currently).

      We are in a secular bear market for equities where the average cyclical bull lasts for 134 weeks and averages a 104% return (thank you Tiho for this data from your blog). So we are now above the average length and return for cyclical bulls. We are also at the higher trading range for the current secular bear market.

      Furthermore, as noted from this blog, the breadth of the market is weak. The stocks leading this move are the S&P100 large caps with high dividend yields. If you have watched Bloomberg or CNBC levels the consensus is that the best (and safest) investment out there is "quality" stocks with "high dividends." Although we are not quite there yet, the consensus level of this view is reaching similar levels of euphoria seen in the Swiss Franc last year. Whenever too many people start parroting each other the consensus is usually wrong.

      Lastly, seasonality wise we are approaching a generally weak quarter. Whereas seasonality in other asset classes such as Precious Metals has historically superior seasonality from Aug-Oct.

      I also agree with the view of this article and do not expect Jackson Hole to usher in any QE or other stimulating policy. Why would they at almost 52 week new highs? I feel the market has been falsely pricing this in and will be disappointed during poor seasonality.

      All in all, if one were to put all the clear information together: poor economic climate, the cyclical bull is long in the tooth, at the upper range of the secular range, looking to make 52 week new highs, with poor market breadth, poor seasonality and false hope of further QE stimulus - I feel we are closer to the top than the bottom.

      I for one subscribe to Jim Roger's style of contrarian investing where you invest when the move is obvious and all that is required is to collect your money from the corner. I don't think equities currently is that opportunity... The risk is far too high for me to attempt to hit a home run.

      Delete
    2. Moving averages (50 and 200 SMA) are pointing up and they usually don't turn on the dime. It is about probability. I may be wrong in calling the bottom for 2012.I will adjust my position accordingly when I am wrong.

      Strength begets strength. Market reaction (correction) will come and a trader can deal with it.

      My crystal ball never good because I am human but I hope I am smart enough (humbly) to just follow the direction of the market. Macro Fundamental is the TALK ( I absolutely respect) but the market and price are the WALK I follow every day..

      PMs are old and tired soldiers. I have a small position of them and they can rest for now. There are other performing warriors.

      Delete
    3. PMs are most certainly not old and tired. They are just getting going after a cyclical bear market.

      Delete
    4. I repeat. PMs are old and tired soldiers. Please give them some energy so they can fight again. Thank you.

      Delete
  18. Hi Tiho,

    Cold you tell me how did you create chart of 5y Break Even Rate?
    I was trying on fred site but I have different values the this on f.e. Bloomberg.
    Your loks very similar.

    Thank you,

    Mariusz

    ReplyDelete
  19. TLT ("Bad bonds" per Bill Gross) may have completed its first wave down...I will add to my short (did not take profit) when the rebound exhausts...a 5 wave down to $95 would be sweet. Patience to a kill.

    QE or no QE..... "Never underestimate the ability of people to be optimistic and believe that everything is going to be okay" (Colm O'Shea..in the Hedge Fund Market Wizards book). You know, the next pie in the sky trade on Wall Street may more likely to a dream of recovery rather than falling into the toilet(again). A good trader is to ride the waves of optimism and pessimism accordingly.

    Trading used to be my hobby and I traded based on macro-fundamental and I lost money and that was OK because I was a very high income earner. My result has changed completely since I quit my job and adapted the Wall Street ways and followed the game rules.

    $NYADV:$NYDEC says this rally will continue. I see no reason to short the stock market for now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Traders never see a reason to short the stock market when it is going up and buy a stock market when it is going down.

      Delete
    2. VIX is falling.... Every one now is so confident that stocks are just going to keep on going up and up and up... So what usually happens next?

      Delete
    3. A trader should be looking for shorting opportunities every day and it is OK to find no high probability trade. Hmmm.. FB may be a good short given the mood and gigantic supply of shares coming to town.

      300 billion out-flow from stock funds vrs 31 billion of in-flow in the past 2 years may explain the low vix? How about a VIX of lucky 7 just to be provocative! It doesn't matter now until price drops and it will eventually. I think Mr. Market will punish the bond holders and cause max pain first before roasting the stock bulls.

      After the Kabooooom hair cut will come the Melt-up orgy. Nature occurrence.

      “Don’t think about what the market’s going to do; you have absolutely no control over that. Think about what you’re going to do if it gets there. In particular, you should spend no time at all thinking about those rosy scenarios in which the market goes your way, since in those situations, there’s nothing more for you to do. Focus instead on those things you want least to happen and on what your response will be.” – William Eckhardt

      Have a wonderful weekend.

      Delete
  20. Anonymous - 5 year break even rate is derived from taking the difference between nominal yield of a 5 year Treasury Bond and 5 year Treasury Inflation Security bond. Hope that makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Tiho what is your take on all the hype about silver manipulation. Are margin hikes, large comex short positions by banks really depressing its price and or volitility? Is it tin hat wearing sillver bugs pie in sky material or do u think there is truth in it?

    ReplyDelete