Saturday, August 4, 2012

Bulls vs Bears: US Equities

Introduction 
When it comes to investing in equity markets, one of the most important rules is to invest at the right time. So what does that mean? Well shorter term traders will argue that timing can be when the RSI goes below 30 oversold, while some traders will argue that you need to follow shorter term cycle patterns and finally others will argue that you should buy into equities when certain moving averages cross above other longer term ones, etc etc. 

I would argue that the most important time to invest into equities is at the beginning of an expansion within the business and investment cycle and the most important time to be out of equities (especially during secular bears) is at the beginning of a contraction within the business and investment cycle. The only problem with all of that is that bulls and bears tend to debate when the business cycle is about to change directions, and many get it wrong over and over due to false signals. So let us discuss as many topics as possible in point form for both the bullish and bearish sides.

Bulls vs Bears: US Equities
  • Bulls say that the current business cycle is still positive and growing. After all, the most important evidence is the fact that US GDP is still expanding on a quarterly basisIndustrial Production is still growing at a very healthy rate and while jobs growth is very slow, it is progressing with the recent data release showing a net gain of 160,000 jobs (chart above). Other data points worth mentioning for the bullish side are the fact that company capex remains strong and retail sales are positive. Bulls say, all of this points to a slow muddle through economic activity as the United States is the best house in a bad neighbourhood and is evidently de-coupling from a European recession.
  • Bears say that while the current business cycle is expanding, the rate of growth is now at stall speed (chart above). Over the last six GDP quarters, five of them have been below 2%. Bears say that every time this has occurred since at least the 1950s, the US has always entered a recession. Furthermore, bearish points include the fact that payrolls are a lagging indicator, as job cuts only occur once CEOs realise we are already in a recession. Bears also argue that retail sales have now dropped for three months in the row. Over the last 60 years, this type of a statistic has only occurred 27 times (1 in 50 event), and 25 out of those 27 times have occurred either during a recession or a quarter before one began. Bears say, stall speed can only be maintained for so long until a recession starts and de-coupling is a very dangerous word last used in 2007 prior to a global bear market.
  • Bulls say that the current manufacturing cycle slowdown, as seen in the chart above with the US ISM chart, is very similar to the previous two in the summer of 2010 and the summer of 2011. All we are going to see is seasonal summer dulldrums and slight disappointment in growth, before we see another pickup into years end.
  • Bears say that a manufacturing slowdown is what we witnessed last year during the summer months. If the recovery was real, then the overall global manufacturing (heavily weighted towards the US) would have recovered already. The fact is, bears argue, that we are now entering a manufacturing recession around the world.
  • Bulls admit that recently data has disappointed, but remain optimistic that it is about to pick up again. They point to the Citigroup US Economic Surprise Index (chart above) and say that on a mean reverting basis, data should start beating expectations as economists have become too bearish. 
  • Bears say that previous data slowdowns mainly occurred in the Developed Markets, which were growing very slowly anyway. Similar occurrences can be seen in late 2007. On the other hand, Global Emerging Markets (GEMs) have been the pillar of strong growth and the major consumers of commodities, since the recovery began in '09 and bears argue that a slowdown in this part of the world is now a very worrying signal.
  • Bulls say that the stock market is undervalued based on the most simplest of all tools - the Price to Earnings multiple ratio, which is currently trading well below its five decade average. They also argue that based on common sense, stocks are undervalued by at least 12% or more (chart above), because earnings are now sitting at record high levels. Therefore, stocks should be trading at 1,600 or even higher. Finally, bulls say that earnings continue to beat expectations in general and this is a positive for stock prices.
  • Bears say P/E multiples expand during secular bull markets (1982 - 2000) and contract during secular bear markets (1966 - 1982 and currently from 2000 onwards). Therefore, further P/E contraction can be expected even if earnings rise higher. Bears also argue, as can be seen in the chart above thanks to short.com, that CAPE 10 (cyclically adjusted price to earnings ratio) places stocks in very expensive territory. Finally, bears say that the Gross Profit Margins have now peaked and are falling and if that wasn't bad enough, revenues are also disappointing expectations too.
  • Bulls say that the US stock market is the best house in a bad neighbourhood when it comes to performance (chart above thanks to yardeni.com), with a better fundamental position than Europe and Emerging Markets, and that is why the S&P is experiencing huge outperformance. Furthermore, bulls say that we are currently in a US presidential cycle and that stocks should be able to post decent gains into year's end.
  • Bears say that de-coupling in equity markets does not last. They argue that in early 2008, Emerging Market equities gave de-coupling a shot for awhile as US equities peaked, but they eventually caught up on the downside. This time around, US equities will be catching up on the downside too. Besides, the bad seasonal period for equities is now upon us, say the bears.
  • Bulls say that the mood in the current market environment is pessimistic and this is best seen with the chart above showing that individual retail investors, as tracked by the AAII survey. The chart shows extreme bearish readings over the last three months, which is a strong buy signal. Furthermore, bulls show that various other sentiment surveys are quite bearish and that stock analysts are in total panic mode (chart #1 & chart #2). Also to note is the fact that retail money continues to sell stocks at the expensive of bonds and that is another positive contrarian signal. Finally, if all of that wasn't enough proof that we are going to rally much higher, bulls say that hedge funds are currently underexposed to US equities, so all in all it is time to buy and not sell.
  • Bears say that surveys are less relevant than actual exposure, because it is the old "who said what versus who bought what" argument. Bears state that cash levels are extremely low in all major indicators from rydex mutual funds (chart above) to pension fund allocations and retail money market funds. Bears also claim that while AAII sentiment survey show an "opinion" of low bulls, the AAII asset allocation survey shows the "action" of very low cash levels. Furthermore, bears claims that the AAII survey isn't confirmed by other surveys, including the very low level of bears in the Investor Intelligence.
  • Bulls say that as volatility remains low and financial conditions remain calm, equity markets can keep trending higher from these levels. Furthermore, the Junk Bond market which is a great barometer of overall risk, is not pricing in a recession nor a bear market (chart above). Finally, bulls state that from a technical perspective, Junk Bond prices look like they are in a healthy uptrend, which is pro-risk and a definitive positive for their equity counter-parts. Also to note is the fact that the VIX can stay very low for a prolonged period of time, according to the bulls.
  • Bears say that the low volatility readings have been a contrarian indicator ever since the Global Financial Crisis started in late 2007, and currently we are in the danger zone again. At the extremely low levels of 15 on the VIX, bears say it is time to short equities with a potential to see lower prices in the months and quarters ahead. Finally, bears say that Junk Bonds tend to correlate very heavily with the VIX, so one shouldn't pay much attention to it as a leading indicator. Furthermore, Junk Bond ETFs are experiencing record inflows which from a contrarian perspective could mean lower prices ahead.
  • Bulls say that the current trend is up. It doesn't matter what any other indicator says, because the most important indicator of all is the price. It has made new highs in 2012, remains above the 200 day moving average (basic uptrend / downtrend gauge) and is also currently trending with higher highs in the short term too. Furthermore, bulls say that the percentage of stocks above 50 day moving average is around 75%, which is quite healthy for an uptrend, while not overbought or extreme. Also to note is the fact that McClellan Oscillator and the Bullish Percent Index are not overbought either, so from an internal breadth point of view, a correction is most likely not due. Finally, the NYSE cumulative AD line is making new highs, so bulls claim it is only a matter of time until the S&P 500 follows.
  • Bears say the equity price is approaching the major supply sell zone (technical resistance) from April 2012 highs, but this time around the internals are rather negative. Bears say one should consider that less than ⅔ of all stocks within the S&P are trading above the 200 day moving average (chart above). Bears also say that the percentage of stocks making new highs versus new lows is very low and is bearishly diverging with the current rise in price, advising a cautious outlook. Dow Theory shows a major non-confirmation between Industrial stocks making new highs, while economically sensitive Transports aren't following, so bears claim it is only a matter of time until the divergence is played out to the downside. Finally, bears claim that whenever cyclical sectors have under-performed the S&P by this much, it has lead to at least an intermediate top and a correction.
  • Bulls say that Dr. Bernanke stands ready to act as early as the Jackson Hole meeting at the end of this month. Further quantitative easing (Fed balance sheet expansion a.k.a. printing of money) and other additional stimulus measures should support the US economy and risk assets through the current slowdown patch until the natural growth cycle picks up.
  • Bears say that while Dr Bernanke will eventually act, he might not act immediately because of the US elections approaching. Furthermore, bears say Bernanke understands that expectations of inflation are currently too high (chart above shows 5 Yr break Evens need to approach at least 2%) and there are currently no risks of deflation as Core CPI is above the Feds target. Finally, bears say that the recent Non Farms Payroll report takes QE3 off the table, so lower prices are possible.
So... when it comes to the medium term time horizon (months to quarters), please let us know what you think on the direction of US equities in a survey poll below:

Survey Poll
After several days of voting, over three hundred traders and investors have spoken toward the first article on Bulls vs Bears debate, with a topic on US equities. About 30% are currently bullish over the medium term time frame, overwhelming 50% are bearish and finally 20% or so are neutral. Another way to look at this is to state that 30% would be buyers, expecting high prices; while 70% are neutral or would be sellers, expecting lower prices. 

I guess contrarians would argue that any polls majority is usually wrong, but this one will be a perfect test. In coming months, we shall truly see how smart and wise the underlying reader base of Short Side of Long really is, and will they be classified into smart money or dumb money. Stay tuned...

45 comments:

  1. Great Saturday morning read. Really commend the time and thought put into this blog.

    If you plot Intrade's "will Obama win the 2012 election" betting data over the past year vs the DOW or the S&P they have probably a .90 correlation. I don't have historical election year data, but it think it's clear that it's "risk on" until November.

    Even still, I don't trust this pig one bit. As a hedge in my IRA I buy small amounts of OFF when the VIX hits 16 or so.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post. I'm a bull here because of elections too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tiho, excellent job. I wish I was as smart as you are when I was your age. I was busy climbing the corporate ladder. I am very luck that I was able to quit my job at 52 and started playing with my investment on a full time basis.

    Bulls survived this past week and successfully rejected the lower prices. In the meanwhile, TLT fell off the back of the truck and its RSI registered the lowest reading since early April and the Moving averages started to roll over.

    My actions next weak: 1. to sell off all my remaining bond funds accumulated since April to lock in the profits so I can afford to eat at the Peak overseeing the spectacular Victoria Harbor-:) 2. to continue to accumulate stocks.

    We have bullish alignment in the daily charts-- 10 EMA/20 EMA/50 SMA and they all are pointing up. To take out the emotion associated with price, I sometime make it "invisible" which is a blotting feature in Stockcharts.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tiho, do you EVER get outside? I kid, I kid....great overview of the economic landscape. More to learn here than in the last week of WSJ issues.

    http://moneybytrading.com/2012/08/03/dollar-and-euro-vs-gold/

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is my first post here. Great charts and thought process. My money is on AAII sentiment index which is in the dirt... this is the dumbest of the dumb money. It is absolutely a no-brainer to be a bull right now just based on that, yet your poll says most people are bearish. Other no-brainer charts like the bond indexes and overbought USD show the extreme pessimism right now which only occurs at a bottom. This market is like shooting at fish in a barrel right now.

    ReplyDelete
  6. As long as there is a positively sloping yield curve, the expansion will continue. I checked bullish medium term on your vote tabulator. When the yield curve is buried negative, and the yield returns to TLT, I'll adjust my portfolio.

    Sentiment is mildly bearish, on Investor's Intelligence and AAII, which is good.

    I am eight percent cash. Rest is equities and commercial real estate.

    P.S. I saw your link on the Scott Grannis blog, "Calafia Beach Pundit". Thought I would check your blog out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Market could continue to rally ahead of any Fed/ECB action. However, the question is, can any action prevent a recession or bear market. The answer is no. Maybe markets rally over the next few months and then finally top out when we start to get QE3 and the like. Then Gold and Commodities will begin their bubble phase.

    ReplyDelete
  8. First of all, thanks to many for commenting and thanks to all who are voting. It will be very interesting to see what the final result will be over the coming several days to a week of voting.

    Vance Schneider - Yes I do get outside... sometimes haha! Majority of the time I'm usually on the iPhone, which as you know, can be used even if you are out and about. By the way Wall Street Journal is a decent newspaper, surely I'm not even close to what they write. :-)

    sunnyview - thank you for posting for the first time. I thought I add some more points on AAII since it is very popular amongst retail investors. Currently the indicator has been posted on just about every single blog known to man, where dumb money hangs around. Also, in case you didn't notice in the chart above, AAII was also very bearish last year around this time and yet the market crashed. While I'm not saying that will happen again, I do question the strength of the indicator for two reasons: 1) it seems to work much better when the signal is given after a prolonged market decline, but does it work when stocks are zooming vertically higher and close to 52 week highs like last year; and 2) AAII doesn't seem to be confirmed by other indicators I follow. Sure some of them are "neutral" but there is really no real fear in the market via breadth spikes, vix spikes, various sentiment survey outright panics, jump in cash levels, etc etc. I guess its the old bull vs bear debate.

    sgt.red.blue.red - thank you for posting. First of all, I have to say that Scott Grannis's blog is great. I read it frequently and he also does great charts. Regarding the bond market, it seems you relay on the yield curve a lot for your decision making process. It has been a great indicator in a normal cycle for the last few decades without a doubt. Are you worried that we aren't in a normal business cycle anymore as Reinhart and Rogoff imply many times over, and with ZIRP policy the yield curve might never invert like in Japan and a recession / bear market could still occur?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is a normal business cycle? This one is has a deferred recovery. At some point rates will rise. The fed will once again raise s-t rates to slow inflation and choke off investment. At that point, the long treasury rates will rise. No one will want them, as everyone will be enjoying the hot stock market. Then, I will be selling stocks and buying treasuries.

      Delete
    2. I was describing a normal business cycle where rates in the G7 do not go to Zero Interest Rate Policy and tightening occurs or starts to occur several quarters into expansion. I see you still foresee such an event in the future, where the Fed tightens rates during the current business cycle so now I understand your strategy and also wish you much luck in executing it.

      Delete
    3. Tiho, You gotta have a plan, but that doesn't mean I can't adjust it in the future.

      BTW, I see you are IB in Australia. What do you know about Coinmach Corporation that was taken private by a Babcock & Brown investor back about 4 years ago?

      Delete
    4. Unfortunately, I do not know anything about the specific takeover. I do private work for high net worth individuals mainly connected in the mining industry of Australia, so my expertise is more linked to those sectors. I wish I could help or comment but the only thing I can really say is: I do know that the Global Financial Crisis made a mockery of Babcock & Brown during 2008 and they eventually defaulted like Bear Sterns and Lehman.

      Delete
  9. For traders like me its VIX against AAII. Dunno which way to go!?!?!

    ReplyDelete
  10. What a great read... you just summarized all of the study, indicators, market psychology that I have been analyzing over the last month in one well written and balanced post.

    Keep up the good work!

    One more factoid: VIX at 15 preceded a 4% S&P multi-day decline the last two times it hit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is quite an interesting statistic from the short term perspective, so thank you for that.

      I have noticed that on a weekly closing basis, VIX seems to be at the third lowest level in over 3 years. Also, the JP Morgan G7 Currency Volatility Index (JPMVXYG7 if you have Bloomberg Terminal) is at the lowest level since late 2007. I become very edgy and quite scared, when everything is so calm, especially because Eurozone fundamentals are not improving in my opinion.

      Delete
  11. Hey Tiho:

    Awesome report! I assume 'neutral' means the market will essentially be range bound in the medium-term.

    My only minor suggestion to your report is that there should have been a 'confused' category on the poll for individuals such as myself. If I'm representative of the 'dumb' money (and I probably am) then most of us have no idea where the market is going--but desperately want to pick a (the right) side! :-) aka deers in the headlight

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I guess you could be right. Neutral would mean, possibility of a consolidation or a small pullback or just rangebound prices.

      I would also like to say one thing to you: do not sell yourself short in thinking you are below average as you do not know where the market is going to be moving.

      I have read many reports from so called "pros" including hedge fund managers, newsletter writers, bloggers, forum wizards, short term traders, technical analysts, cycle analysts, Gann-cycle traders, Elliot Wave traders, fundamentalists, value investors, swing traders, scalpers, self proclaimed smart money gurus and the likes and you would be surprised how many times they are all wrong. Majority of them claim amazing skills and yet they are probably wrong about 66% of the time at least, if not more.

      I post here on my blog my own thoughts on how I am trading this market for all to see and I can honestly say that I am no better than you. That is for sure! I am happy when I get at least something right every so often, because I know regardless of claims people put forward, they aren't as good as they say they are. If they were as good as they claim, they would be stinking rich...

      Delete
    2. Haha! Thanks Tiho! Comments like that while not boosting my account sure help the confidence to continue 'playing' the game despite the plethora of 'market wizards' as you put it.

      Delete
  12. I think there is a reasonable narrative which explains what appears to be a very confusing blend of dour sentiment yet a stock market which just won't go down despite increasingly bad fundamentals. I call it the nexus of perceived safety and yield. The key word is "perceived" as markets have a way of making people pay for chasing yield. If you look across asset markets, people are afraid of the backdrop, but they are also afraid to settle for 0% yields in cash. They have been flocking into anything they think is relatively safe with yield. Over 80% of junk bond closed-end funds are trading at a premium to NAV. Pimco's main fund is at over 70% premium! Stocks like KMB and T have gone parabolic, as those kinds of stocks have re-priced like bonds based on yield. There is an implosion unfolding in derivative markets that few are even aware of yet, which explains why gov't bonds are so strong. There is a growing shortage of collateral, so people are being forced to buy bonds with no or even negative yields. The BOJ couldn't find enough JGB's to buy recently, as they are locked up as collateral....as insurers like Pru announce massive profits at Japanese derivatives business. Just as most weren't aware of the mortgage/debt avalanche unfolding until it was too late, the villagers at the base of the mountain are once again ignorant of the fact a crisis is already unfolding on a grand scale. The point of recognition is likely to be violent, but the timing is of course the hardest part.

    Finally, i think people would be well served to remember that there is no divine law which states that the USD, treasuries and stocks can't all go down together. Seemingly invincible market correlations remain intact until they die a gruesome and typically violent death.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Most people just follow one main indicator / tool in their style. They either collect a few indicators which point to a contrarian signal and than they do that. Others mainly just follow technicals, moving averages, trend lines, cycles, RSI etc and the fundamentals would just follow valuations a lot of the time.

      It takes great skills to try and read and notice just about everything humanly possible around us, because Mr Markets leaves hints everywhere for us. But they are hidden and covered underneath all the noise and a lot of traders dismiss them with their ignorance.

      You seem to do the best possible job trying to pick up almost everything you can that is presented to you. I must admit, the last comment, and this one too, that you have left on my blog have gained deserved attention from myself personally. You are definitely a deep thinker from what I can see / read, something that is very rare, but necessary, for prolonged long term success in this business. That is just my personal opinion.

      Delete
    2. Tiho - you are too kind. I've enjoyed your blog immensely since coming across it a few weeks ago. I typically only frequent a select handfull and you are right at the top of my list now.

      Looking across the macro landscape is what I spend all my time doing and I do tend to be quite early...which i am trying to get better at exercising more patience. My colleague and I are seeing a lot of interesting things that we see getting little or no coverage - the collateral crisis, trading in yuan forwards and what appears to be a burgeoning funding crisis in China, Brazil bailing out their banks last week, etc. The action in vols has been an area we are watching closely - the COT data this week on the VIX is insane. It looks to me like there are major issues in the plumbing of interest rate derivatives and that there may be sellers of vol on a massive scale in some related way that we have't quite connected the dots on yet. The totality of what I use suggests that the next couple of months may be VERY interesting.

      Delete
    3. Bad or good thing will happen to the market only when people care. "You can wait until people start to care…" per Colm O'Shea as quoted by Jack Schwager in his latest book...Hedge Fund Market Wizards.

      The great trade can decipher when people start to care. For me, I just follow.

      Delete
    4. Juco- what is the play? Short bonds and stocks and long Gold?

      Delete
    5. Everybody I know that has participated in the PMs bull market over the last 11 years has been trained to constant gains and higher highs. So now majority of these investors thinks Gold will go up when stocks fall, it will go up if bonds fall, and it will go up if the US Dollar goes down, or even if the Euro goes down.

      What about if Gold falls another 20% to 30% from here during a global recession and finally has a proper bear market and a down year after 11 annual gains. The catalyst ends up being EU default of some kind and Chinese hard landing? And than a recovery in Gold when they print trillions towards and above $5,000 per ounce?

      Remember that in 1976, Gold dropped by 40% to 50% for year and half, before it went up 8 times into a final bubble spike. Now... I'm not predicting these things, all I am saying that it is possible. Nevertheless, I remain long PMs sector and I don't know what will really happen. I prefer to exec rise patience during cyclical bear markets and buy more.

      Delete
    6. Hello JordanRB,

      I think the play is short the perceived safehaven stocks markets over the next couple/few months. The US and Mexico have been to most resilient major markets I am aware of. For those able/willing, puts appear pretty cheap in a lot of areas. I think shorting treasuries is still tough in here, but like Tiho, think credit is probably a good short. My experience has been that a parabolic move like we saw in long dated US treasuries typically involves a hard test of the high at some point - i.e. a failed rally. This most recent decline sets up that potential, but I prefer to wait for confirmation. We are getting the failed rally now in US and Mexican stocks and it is unfolding with classic technical weakness, divergences and as a global recession is unfolding. The big concern is whether the mob can become and stay so irrational as to bid up the broader stock market based solely on the promise and deliverance of more money printing. I think the door won't be big enough to allow many investors/traders out when markets see behind the curtain and the Wizard of Oz can't keep the stock market up with a greater fool theory alone.

      I'm a long suffering miners investor and prefer them to gold even more in here. They are acting very dry of late and my process suggests a major cycle low may have been put in with the May low and July test.

      I've seen/heard/read a number of skeptics on gold touting the "gold is up 11 years in a row" fact as a reason to be worried about gold. I think it is important to remember that secular bull markets can have very little draw down periods. For example, the SPX had only one modestly negative calendar year from 1982-2000. Also, gold is really just the reciprocal of the money printing taking place, and with every major central bank seemingly on the cusp of going hog wild with the printing presses, I'm not sure we have a historical precedence for what we are facing.

      Also, the basic premise I've believed is that the fact that this period follows the 2008 crisis, i.e. the "Lehman moment", policymakers will try at all costs to prevent a deflationary collapse. I think the major inflection point for that decision was made last December when the Germans signed off on LTRO I. The Germans know they face depression and banking system failure if they don't allow a printing party - they are just being very German about trying to manage the printing and maximize the return to them. As we saw this week with the central bank wack job from Boston, our money is managed by flat earthers - these people literally think that what they are doing will work despite obvious evidence to the contrary.

      Delete
    7. Thank you for the response.

      I focus on the miners in my service, thedailygold.com. We've done okay during the bear market and I've learned major lessons along the way. Most gold stocks are junk. You have to dig down to really find the cream of the crop. The miners are now leading the metals which is a good sign.

      I agree with Tiho's bearish view, however my research suggests that as long as Gold/gold stocks remain long-term negatively correlated to equities (as they've been for nearly a year) then they are at the start of a new cyclical bull. However, if gold rallies with the stock market for a few quarters, than I'd be wary since gold would then be positively correlated.

      I also agree that the 11 years in a row is not important. (Probably the only thing which I could successfully argue against the brilliant Tiho). The Dow was up from 1985-1999 every year but one- and that was a 4% loss.

      Delete
    8. You are both right. Gold is currently down about 7% year over year and there has been other times where it lost single digits over the 12 month rolling period since 2001. But are single digit corrections enough? Silver is down 30% plus over 12 months and almost 15% down in the last 16 months.

      Also calendar year wise, it has constantly gone up year after year. I guess I do have wishful thinking of a major correction, which would mean a proper bottom and a proper buying opportunity... instead of these mild 17% corrections which are barley break into bear market territory in the first place. Lets get some real FEAR and some real SHAKE OUTS going... (wishful thinking I know, I know)!

      Delete
  13. age and reality motivate me to be "conservative", financially. I define it as "keeping the risk of losing 50% below 5% while keeping the chance of gaining 6% above 75%". In this environment, I cannot find an asset allocation that seems to allow this to happen. Maybe this is what it feels like to be "frozen by fear"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The market moves of late indicate that you are not the only one!
      Sometimes the best trade is to retreat and sit in cash and wait until things become more clear...

      Delete
  14. Some short term updates from technical perspective on equity markets:

    - Overbought: S&P 500, DAX, FTSE, Euro 50, RTSI, Bovespa, Hang Seng and All Ords are all trading above 2 standard deviations away from the 50 day MA. Also Tech, Energy, Industrials, Oil Drillers and Semiconductors are all above 2 SDs away from 50 day MA as well. This is considered shorter term overbought signal.

    - Divergence: Dow Transports so far has refused to close above the 200 day MA, even with a powerful rally over the last 5 weeks. Remember S&P 500 is now up 5 weeks in the row. There is still a major divergence between Transports and Industrial stocks - the classic Dow Theory warning.

    - Breadth: Despite a powerful rally over the last two days in the S&P 500 which has now pushed the index with 1% of a new bull market high, there is still less than 66% of companies within the index above their respective 200 day MAs. There is also less than 66% of companies trading in an uptrend according to Bullish Percent Index (Point & Figure uptrend).

    - Breadth: S&P 500 equal weighted index, aka Value Line, is no where near the March / April peak, unlike the actual S&P 500 itself. The overall rally is being driven by less and less stock components.

    - Breadth: Over the last few days S&P 500 rallied to a higher high. Percentage of stocks making new 50 day highs made a lower low. Percentage of stocks making new 100 day highs made a lower low. Percentage of stocks making new 200 day highs (52 week highs) also made a lower low. Non-confirmtion is evident in the current rally. Nasdaq breadth is even worse!

    - VIX remains at the 15 handle, while the VIX's 200 day MA is at the second lowest level since 2007. The other time VIX's 200 day MA was this low was around May 2011, when global risk assets like equities, commodities and currencies peaked. This also includes MSCI World, Euro, Silver, Copper etc etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. If I may add to the technical--- Price action favors stocks( and a reaction is always imminent and a part of the game). Bonds are getting too heavy.

      Delete
    3. UUP--we have bearish MACD cross and pointing down..12 day EMA just dips below the zero line for the time since May. Pro-Risk trades should do well.

      Delete
    4. I'm very bearish. I think the Euro is about to crash in coming months and quarters.

      Delete
    5. Ahhhh! Tiho is right about the fundamentals. I hope I will be smart enough to see the turning point. For people (me included of course) who try to play the trading game and make money, no short (stock) yet!

      Delete
    6. I just think and invest long term, so short term technicals and MAs are sometimes meaningless to me. That is because in couple of months from now MAs can be just as bearish as they are bullish today, according to what you stated above. No one should ever follow what I do. My opinion is just that, and it does not mean I am right. Having said all that, I just see a a deflationary outcome in coming months and quarters. I see a bear market and I see a recession.

      When its all is said and done, the bottom will be true one. I think stocks will embark on a secular bull market after one more period of cyclical negativity and it will be a great time to own equities for the long run. Hopefully a default or two occur in the up and coming period with the Eurozone, and government in the US starts to deal with its entitlements liabilities. If any progress is mad win both, we will have a secular bull past the up-and-coming cyclical bear downdraft.

      Delete
    7. If people share the same time-frame and hypothesis so you are, and have the same resolve like you and know when they are wrong and switch, then it is OK to follow you.

      Your analysis is like a light bulb at the corner of my eye. Thanks.

      Delete
  15. Tiho, just curious if you have any public records of when the central banks around the world stopped accumulating gold in the 1970s and 1980s? That would be some very interesting information to chew on. As we know, central banks around the world are currently accumulating physical gold on every pullback.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there sunnyview - it really depends on which central banks and governments you are talking about. It seems that when Developed Economies sell Gold, like Gordon Brown and UK government between 1999-2001 Gold bottomed. This is now officially called the "Brown Bottom".

      Also between 1976 and 1980 IMF and the US were selling Gold on the open market. Than when Gold spiked into 1980 during its mania phase, IMF and the US reversed its strategy and started buying it back. Funnily enough Gold crashed.

      On the other hand smaller purchases by Emerging Market governments and CBs have been occurring for years already. Maybe that is a signal that Gold topped after a 11 year run up, but I don't think so based on all other valuation methods. I think Gold is rather cheap.

      So therefore, I rather think that whenever UK buys it back, it will be the end, especially if Gordon Brown himself comes on TV to give UK prime minister advice and says "I think Gold is a must purchase for the UK government". If that as to occur, I'd be close to selling my PMs holdings!

      Delete
  16. Hello gang...

    Just wanted to give you heads up on a GDX trade I may enter as soon as tomorrow:

    http://wp.me/p2CT0a-26

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you moneybytrading.com. Do you see any reasons to why your trade outlook could be wrong and Gold Miners break down for one more leg?

      Delete
  17. Tiho, you should have this post updated on a regular basis like the blog charts. It is great to have such a great compilation of the ongoing battle between bulls and bears and weigh each other arguments. Actually it should be made into a weekly newsletter haha. I would certainly pay for that instead of having to read several authors with their biases...

    ReplyDelete
  18. I would like to ask BHP RIO before the election have the opportunity to continue to go up?
    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure. If you know, tell me so I can also buy them! -)

      Delete