Thursday, October 27, 2011

Stocks: What's Next For Equities - Part I

Note: This is part one of a two part write up re-visiting current equity market conditions.

I don't follow politicians too much and I don't really take notice of what they say. They always blab on about nonsense and majority of the time get things wrong. However, if you were to take at least some interest this morning in Asia, you would be reading the front page headlines of various business media outlets informing you that EU leaders have finally come to a solution agreement for the debt crisis. Wow... what a surprise... this was only the 14th time EU leaders have managed to put forward a solution in last 21 months (sarcasm). But is it the real deal this time?

Well that depends on your time horizon. The details are Greece is in voluntary 50% haircut and the EFSF is going to be leveraged un to 5 times towards one trillion Euros. That means, a panic default has been averted for the time being. However, we should all know by now that the only way to fix the problem is in one of two ways: either default by writing down the debt in proper losses or inflating the debt away by making it worthless to the purchasing power. I always argued that global governments will be using the "inflate" strategy, hence why I remain bullish on commodities and bearish on government bonds. And if you think about it, while equities are in a secular bear market, this does not mean they must move down in nominal terms, but rather sideways in a long trading range as they adjust to high inflation rates. I am sure some person will argue that we have no inflation, but that is just total stupidity.

Between September 27th and October 04th, I wrote a two part in depth article focusing on sentiment, breadth, seasonality and technicals of the S&P 500 (Articles: Equities: Sentiment Overview - Part I and Equities: Sentiment Overview - Part II). The first article warned investors who were short equities that sentiment was becoming extremely pessimistic indicating that a rally was coming, while the second article pretty much nailed the bottom on a day arguing that internal breadth was extremely oversold and bullishly diverging. Similar, but not the same occurrences happened at March 09 and August 10 lows.

One of the more important charts I put forward is re-posted above. On October 04th I argued that:
Usually intermediate bottoms occur when the overall index itself makes new lows and yet the Declines do not outnumber Advances, like they did on the first trough. So for example, the recent stock market crash bottomed into 09th of August with 21 Day AD Line hitting a reading of -800. That means over the last 21 days, we have had 800 more Declines compared to Advances on average per day. Now the S&P 500 is making a lower low towards 1040 support area, and yet AD Line is diverging. This is a bullish divergence and it lets us know bears are slowly but surly exhausting themselves.
So here we are almost a month later and the S&P 500 is still at that famous 1250 cross road. The question now stands, what is about to happen next? Has Europe finally solved majority of its problems? Does the equity market have an all clear to now break 1250 resistance? Can we move higher above 1270 level where 200 day moving average sits? Are we now in a sustainable uptrend? Is the market overextended to the upside? Is this a great time to short the market and not trust the Europeans? As you can see, there are a lot of questions to be answered, but before I start putting forward some ideas in Part II, I would like to ask you - the readers of this blog - what your opinion is...

6 comments:

  1. On Short Term basis, the market is overbought. The market made a classical bear-trap in beginning of October. Now, momentum is good, sentiment is better, but still cautious on an array of indicators (Naim, AII,...). We are at support/resistance level, not not on SP but also on USD, EM and a large panel of Commos. I think the market is due for a contrarian bear-trap at these levels. Downside move will be bougth. I still believe the market is due for the higher 1200' or lower 1300' in late nov/early dec. I still follow the analog of 1946-1947.

    Fred

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tiho:

    There is so much money on the sidelines in the US at zero percent interest rates who knows how high high is for the US stock market. Literally sky is the limit and maybe, maybe in time will create another major bubble in paper assets. In time....I don't think the Fed will tighten anytime soon until they are certain they have reversed the US economy out of the ditch and probably will be late in policy change at that point. The Euro crises will be well in the rear view mirror then..............if you think differently you are betting against the US Central Bank. Could work out differently this time, but never has before.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tiho, I use the AD indicator (10 days sma) but in the Nasdaq.

    ¿Why?

    Easy. In the NYSE there are lot of things that are ETFs, leveraged ETFs, inverse ETFs, ETNs, etc, etc, etc. So, IMHO opinion is better to avoid that indicador and use the AD of the Nasdaq where all the components of the market are shares.

    In fact the indicator is more useful and balanced over time.

    Check for your self!

    Greetings

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fred - I know so many bears that where shorting around August so convincingly and recommending bonds. They certainly did get trapped! S&P 500 futures just hit, 1270 neckline, 2 standard deviations above its 50 day MA and are currently testing 200 MA - all strong resistance levels. It will be interesting to see how this goes forward... Your view is a downside move will be bought. Will you be buying too?

    Anonymous #1 - Fed tighten? Hehe I argue with you, they just print money. Even if they do tighten in years from now, it will still be below inflation. Fed is famous for negative real interest rates during 1970s, and the same will be true during 2010s.

    Anonymous #2 - I guess one can use Nasdaq too, because they are all operating companies only. I do not really mind. I have data for both and it is all pretty much the same majority of the time. I like NYSE because it is very broad. Thanks for the heads up!

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Tiho: no, just selling on strength what I bought in early october. Downside move would be capped by fibo32, upside move by 1310 at the max. i will consider short again when everybody will be sure Euro is saved and talk about 1400 again by year end.
    Fred

    ReplyDelete
  6. Here is what I have in mind about the analog. Time-frame different, but overall shape of the move match.
    http://users.skynet.be/derfem/DJA46.png
    Fred

    ReplyDelete